Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane prepared on a support with in situ embedded zeolite nanoparticles

Dong, Lei-xi, Huang, Xiao-chuan, Wang, Zhi, Yang, Zhe, Wang, Xiao-mao, Tang, Chuyang Y.·2016·Separation and Purification Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.043
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.043

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Cyna, 2002, Two years of nanofiltration at the Mery-sur-Oise plant, France, Desalination, 147, 1, 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00578-7 · DOI
  2. Radjenović, 2008, Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment, Water Res., 42, 3601, 10.1016/j.watres.2008.05.020 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beyer, 2014, Long-term performance and fouling analysis of full-scale direct nanofiltration (NF) installations treating anoxic groundwater, J. Membr. Sci., 468, 339, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.004 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.004
  4. Lopes, 2013, Production of drinking water using a multi-barrier approach integrating nanofiltration: a pilot scale study, Sep. Purif. Technol., 119, 112, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2013.09.002
  5. Sanches, 2013, Removal of pesticides from water combining low pressure UV photolysis with nanofiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol., 115, 73, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.04.044 · DOI
  6. Doederer, 2014, Rejection of disinfection by-products by RO and NF membranes: influence of solute properties and operational parameters, J. Membr. Sci., 467, 195, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.029 · DOI
  7. Sadmani, 2014, Nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active and endocrine disrupting compounds as a function of compound interactions with DOM fractions and cations in natural water, Sep. Purif. Technol., 122, 462, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.003 · DOI
  8. Chang, 2014, Comparison of polyamide nanofiltration and low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes on As(III) rejection under various operational conditions, Desalination, 334, 10, 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.002 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.002
  9. Shen, 2015, Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis, Sci. Total Environ., 527, 520, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.037 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Madsen, 2014, Applicability and modelling of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for remediation of groundwater polluted with pesticides and pesticide transformation products, Sep. Purif. Technol., 125, 111, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.038 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.038
  11. Fujioka, 2014, Nanofiltration of trace organic chemicals: a comparison between ceramic and polymeric membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 136, 258, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.039 · DOI
  12. Lee, 2011, A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential, J. Membr. Sci., 370, 1, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mohammad, 2015, Nanofiltration membranes review: recent advances and future prospects, Desalination, 356, 226, 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.043 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fan, 2014, Improved performance of composite nanofiltration membranes by adding calcium chloride in aqueous phase during interfacial polymerization process, J. Membr. Sci., 452, 90, 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.026 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.026
  15. Verıssimo, 2006, Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 279, 266, 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.014 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.014
  16. Lau, 2012, A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review, Desalination, 287, 190, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.004 · DOI
  17. Ahmad, 2005, Properties–performance of thin film composites membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time, J. Membr. Sci., 255, 67, 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.021 · DOI
  18. Lau, 2015, A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: history, applications, challenges and approaches, Water Res., 80, 306, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.037 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Yin, 2015, Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment, J. Membr. Sci., 479, 256, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Safarpour, 2015, Development of a novel high flux and fouling-resistant thin film composite nanofiltration membrane by embedding reduced graphene oxide/TiO2, Sep. Purif. Technol., 154, 96, 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.039 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hu, 2013, A high performance silica-fluoropolyamide nanofiltration membrane prepared by interfacial polymerization, Sep. Purif. Technol., 110, 31, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.001 · DOI
  22. Rakhshan, 2015, Removal of triazines from water using a novel OA modified SiO2/PA/PSf nanocomposite membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol., 147, 245, 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.04.013 · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.04.013
  23. Dong, 2015, Fabrication and anti-biofouling properties of alumina and zeolite nanoparticle embedded ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination, 365, 70, 10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.023 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.023
  24. Wang, 2011, In situ embedment and growth of anhydrous and hydrated aluminum oxide particles on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 368, 134, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.038 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.038
  25. Jeong, 2007, Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: a new concept for reverse osmosis membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 294, 1, 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.025 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Liang, 2012, A novel ZnO nanoparticle blended polyvinylidene fluoride membrane for anti-irreversible fouling, J. Membr. Sci., 394–395, 184, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.040 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.040
  27. Xiao, 2011, Combined effect of membrane and foulant hydrophobicity and surface charge on adsorptive fouling during microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 373, 140, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kimura, 2003, Rejection of organic micropollutants (disinfection by-products, endocrine disrupting compounds, and pharmaceutically active compounds) by NF/RO membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 227, 113, 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kong, 2015, Rejection of pharmaceuticals during forward osmosis and prediction by using the solution–diffusion model, J. Membr. Sci., 476, 410, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.026 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.026
  30. Tang, 2009, Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers, Desalination, 242, 168, 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Emadzadeh, 2014, Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization, J. Membr. Sci., 449, 74, 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.014 · DOI
  32. Huang, 2013, Role of NaA zeolites in the interfacial polymerization process towards a polyamide nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane, RSC Adv., 3, 8203, 10.1039/c3ra40960k · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lind, 2010, Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 8230, 10.1021/es101569p · DOI · Paper page
  34. Yin, 2012, Fabrication of a novel thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane containing MCM-41 silica nanoparticles (NPs) for water purification, J. Membr. Sci., 423–424, 238, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.020 · DOI
  35. Bowen, 2002, Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration – critical assessment and model development, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57, 1121, 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00413-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Tansel, 2006, Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 51, 40, 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.020 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Wang, 2015, Performance of nanofiltration membrane in rejecting trace organic compounds: experiment and model prediction, Desalination, 370, 7, 10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.010 · DOI
  38. Fujioka, 2015, Rejection of trace organic chemicals by a nanofiltration membrane: the role of molecular properties and effects of caustic cleaning, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 1, 846
  39. Nghiem, 2004, Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1888, 10.1021/es034952r · DOI
  40. Verliefde, 2009, Influence of solute–membrane affinity on rejection of uncharged organic solutes by nanofiltration membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 2400, 10.1021/es803146r · doi:10.1021/es803146r
  41. Nghiem, 2008, NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan: transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling, Sep. Purif. Technol., 62, 709, 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.027 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kong, 2016, Assessment of the hindered transport model in predicting the rejection of trace organic compounds by nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 498, 57, 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.062 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.062

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Dong, L.-X., Huang, X.-C., Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Wang, X.-M., & Tang, C. Y.
Venue
Separation and Purification Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
166
Pages
230-239
ISSN
1383-5866 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.043
OpenAlex
W2346888832
Cited by
210
References
1
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51290284, 51278268)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane prepared on a support with in situ embedded zeolite nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.043
The paper
Dong, L.-X., Huang, X.-C., Wang, Z., Yang, Z., Wang, X.-M., & Tang, C. Y. (2016). A thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane prepared on a support with in situ embedded zeolite nanoparticles. Separation and Purification Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.