CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Kantian Philosophy and Modern InterpretationsLogic and Philosophy of ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Helmholtz's Kant revisited (Once more). The all-pervasive nature of Helmholtz's struggle with Kant's Anschauung

De Kock, Liesbet·2016·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this analysis, the classical problem of Hermann von Helmholtz's (1821-1894) Kantianism is explored from a particular vantage point, that to my knowledge, has not received the attention it deserves notwithstanding its possible key role in disentangling Helmholtz's relation to Kant's critical project. More particularly, we will focus on Helmholtz's critical engagement with Kant's concept of intuition [Anschauung] and (the related issue of) his dissatisfaction with Kant's doctrinal dualism. In doing so, it soon becomes clear that both (i) crucially mediated Helmholtz's idiosyncratic appropriation and criticism of (certain aspects of) Kant's critical project, and (ii) can be considered as a common denominator in a variety of issues that are usually addressed separately under the general header of (the problem of) Helmholtz's Kantianism. The perspective offered in this analysis can not only shed interesting new light on some interpretive issues that have become commonplace in discussions on Helmholtz's Kantianism, but also offers a particular way of connecting seemingly unrelated dimensions of Helmholtz's engagement with Kant's critical project (e.g. Helmholtz's views on causality and space). Furthermore, it amounts to the rather surprising conclusion that Helmholtz's most drastic revision of Kant's project pertains to his assumption of free will as a formal condition of experience and knowledge.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Allison, 1995, On naturalizing Kant's transcendental psychology, Dialectica, 49, 335
  2. Baur, 2003, Kant, Lonergan, and Fichte on the critique of immediacy and the epistemology of constraint in human knowing, International Philosophical Quarterly, 43, 91, 10.5840/ipq200343158 · DOI
  3. Cassedy, 2008, A history of the concept of stimulus and the role it played in the neurosciences, Journal for the History of Neuroscience, 174, 405, 10.1080/09647040701296861 · DOI
  4. De Kock, 2014, Voluntarism in early psychology: the case of Hermann von Helmholtz, History 719 of Psychology, 17, 105, 10.1037/a0035978 · DOI
  5. De Kock, 2014, Hermann von Helmholtz's empirico-transcendentalism reconsidered: 721 construction and constitution in Helmholtz's psychology of the object, Science in Context, 27, 709, 10.1017/S026988971400026X · DOI
  6. Erdmann, 1921, Die Philosophischen Grundlagen von Helmholtz’ Wahrnehmungstheorie, Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 21, 3
  7. Finger, 2002, The neuroscience of helmholtz and the theories of Johannes Müller, Part 1: Nerve cell structure, vitalism and the nerve impulse, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 11, 136, 10.1076/jhin.11.2.136.15190 · DOI
  8. Finger, 2002, The neuroscience of helmholtz and the theories of Johannes Müller, Part 2: Sensation and perception, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 11, 234, 10.1076/jhin.11.3.234.10392 · DOI
  9. Helmholtz, 1894, Über den Ursprung der richtigen Deutung unserer Sinneseindrücke, Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 7, 81
  10. Helmholtz, 1896, Ueber das Sehen des Menschen, Vol. 1, 85
  11. Hintikka, 1972, Kantian intuitions, Inquiry, 15, 341, 10.1080/00201747208601670 · DOI
  12. Koenigsberger, 1902, vol. 3
  13. Mensch, 2009, Intuition and nature in Kant and Goethe, European Journal of Philosophy, 19, 431
  14. Neuber, 2012, Helmholtz's theory of space and its significance for Schlick, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20, 163, 10.1080/09608788.2011.650977 · DOI
  15. Oberdan, 2015, From Helmholtz to Schlick: The evolution of the sign-theory of perception, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 52, 35, 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.04.004 · DOI
  16. Pastore, 1993, The “Inside-outside problem” and Wolfgang Köhler, Advances in Psychology, 99, 221, 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62774-0 · DOI
  17. Patton, 2009, Signs, toy models, and the A priori, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 40, 281, 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.07.004 · DOI
  18. Rachlin, 2005, What Müller's law of specific nerve energies says about the mind, Behavior and Philosophy, 33, 41
  19. Riehl, 1904, Helmholtz in seinem Verhältnis zu Kant, Kant Studien, 9, 261
  20. Stumpf, 1895, Hermann von Helmholtz and the New Psychology, Psychological Review, 2, 1, 10.1037/h0070633 · DOI
  21. Thompson, 1972, Singular terms and intuitions in Kant's epistemology, The Review of Metaphysics, 26, 314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Untitled work

    Safron, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00030 · Cited by 133

    “This integration of action with perception is likely crucial for agentic planning and the counterfactual simulations upon which it is based (Hassabis and Maguire, 2009; MacKay, 2019), without which the development of coherent world models may be impossible (De Kock, 2016; Friston, 2017).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
De Kock, L.
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
56
Pages
20-32
ISSN
0039-3681 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.009
OpenAlex
W2176213882
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Flanders Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
Hermann von Helmholtz, Kantian ethics, intuition, dualism, causality, space, free will, philosophy of science, reception of Kant
MeSH terms
Humans, Metaphysics, Perception, Intuition, History, 19th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review