Cited by 32Race, Genetics, and SocietyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Implications of the apportionment of human genetic diversity for the apportionment of human phenotypic diversity

Open access
Edge, Michael D., Rosenberg, Noah A.·2015·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Abstract

Researchers in many fields have considered the meaning of two results about genetic variation for concepts of "race." First, at most genetic loci, apportionments of human genetic diversity find that worldwide populations are genetically similar. Second, when multiple genetic loci are examined, it is possible to distinguish people with ancestry from different geographical regions. These two results raise an important question about human phenotypic diversity: To what extent do populations typically differ on phenotypes determined by multiple genetic loci? It might be expected that such phenotypes follow the pattern of similarity observed at individual loci. Alternatively, because they have a multilocus genetic architecture, they might follow the pattern of greater differentiation suggested by multilocus ancestry inference. To address the question, we extend a well-known classification model of Edwards (2003) by adding a selectively neutral quantitative trait. Using the extended model, we show, in line with previous work in quantitative genetics, that regardless of how many genetic loci influence the trait, one neutral trait is approximately as informative about ancestry as a single genetic locus. The results support the relevance of single-locus genetic-diversity partitioning for predictions about phenotypic diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.12.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analogous measures of population differences in quantitative phenotypic traits and genetic loci-termed QST and FST, respectively-are approximately equal in neutral evolutionary models that include genetic drift but not natural selection.

    “In other words, analogous measures of population differences in quantitative phenotypic traits and genetic loci—termed QST and FST, respectively—are approximately equal in neutral evolutionary models that include genetic drift but not natural selection.”
  • Under a null model in which phenotypes are selectively neutral, genetic propensity differences contributing to phenotypic differences among populations are predicted to be small, with the expected difference among populations in the trait having comparable magnitude to the classical estimate of the 'apportionment of human genetic diversity'.

    “Under a null model in which phenotypes are selectively neutral, genetic propensity differences contributing to phenotypic differences among populations are predicted to be small.”
  • Under neutrality, the magnitude of phenotypic differences connects to the apportionment computation rather than the ancestry computation.

    “analysis of models for the genetic basis of phenotypes finds that under neutrality, the magnitude of phenotypic differences connects to the apportionment computation rather than the ancestry computation [42, 44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Bamshad MJ Wooding S Watkins WS Ostler CT Batzer MA Jorde LB 2003 Human population genetic structure and inference of group membership American Journal of Human Genetics 72 578 589 12557124 PMC1180234
  2. Barbujani G Ghirotto S Tassi F 2013 Nine things to remember about human genome diversity Tissue Antigens 82 155 164 24032721
  3. Barbujani G Magagni A Minch E Cavalli-Sforza LL 1997 An apportionment of human DNA diversity Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 4516 4519 9114021 PMC20754
  4. Berg JJ Coop G 2014 A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation PLoS Genetics 10 e1004412 25102153 PMC4125079
  5. Bowcock AM Ruiz-Linares A Tomfohrde J Minch E Kidd JR Cavalli-Sforza LL 1994 High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites Nature 368 455 457 7510853
  6. Brown RA Armelagos GJ 2001 Apportionment of racial diversity: a review Evolutionary Anthropology 10 34 40
  7. Deheuvels P Puri ML Ralescu SS 1989 Asymptotic expansions for sums of nonidentically distributed Bernoulli random variables Journal of Multivariate Analysis 28 282 303
  8. Donovan BM (forthcoming) Putting humanity back into the teaching of human biology Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 25700850
  9. Edwards AWF 2003 Human genetic diversity: Lewontin’s fallacy Bioessays 25 798 801 12879450
  10. Felsenstein J 1973 Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters American Journal of Human Genetics 25 471 492 4741844 PMC1762641
  11. Glasgow JM 2003 On the new biology of race The Journal of Philosophy 100 456 474
  12. Goodman AH 2000 Why genes don’t count (for racial differences in health) American Journal of Public Health 90 1699 1702 11076233 PMC1446406
  13. Hardimon MO 2012 The idea of a scientific concept of race Journal of Philosophical Research 37 249 282
  14. Hochman A 2013 Against the new racial naturalism The Journal of Philosophy 110 331 351
  15. Holsinger KE Weir BS 2009 Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST Nature Reviews Genetics 10 639 650 PMC4687486 19687804
  16. Lande R 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution Evolution 30 314 334 28563044
  17. Lande R 1992 Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and colonization Evolution 46 381 389 28564025
  18. Li JZ Absher DM Tang H Southwick AM Casto AM Ramachandran S 2008 Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation Science 319 1100 1104 18292342
  19. Lynch M Spitze K Real L 1994 Evolutionary genetics of Daphnia Ecological Genetics 109 128 Princeton Princeton University Press
  20. Mahalanobis PC 1936 On the generalized distance in statistics Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India 2 49 55
  21. Mountain JL Cavalli-Sforza LL 1997 Multilocus genotypes, a tree of individuals, and human evolutionary history American Journal of Human Genetics 61 705 718 9326336 PMC1715971
  22. Pujol B Wilson AJ Ross RIC Pannell JR 2008 Are QST-FST comparisons for natural populations meaningful? Molecular Ecology 17 4782 4785 19140971
  23. Relethford JH 2002 Apportionment of global human genetic diversity based on craniometrics and skin color American Journal of Physical Anthropology 118 393 398 12124919
  24. Risch N Burchard E Ziv E Tang H 2002 Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease Genome Biology 3 comment 2007.1–12 PMC139378 12184798
  25. Rogers AR Harpending HC 1983 Population structure and quantitative characters Genetics 105 985 1002 17246186 PMC1202238
  26. Rosenberg NA 2011 A population-genetic perspective on the similarities and differences among worldwide human populations Human Biology 83 659 684 22276967 PMC3531797
  27. Rosenberg NA Li LM Ward R Pritchard JK 2003a Informativeness of genetic markers for inference of ancestry American Journal of Human Genetics 73 1402 1422 14631557 PMC1180403
  28. Rosenberg NA Pritchard JK Weber JL Cann HM Kidd KK Zhivotovsky LA 2003b Response to Comment on “Genetic Structure of Human Populations” Science 300 1877 12493913
  29. Rosenberg NA Pritchard JK Weber JL Cann HM Kidd KK Zhivotovsky LA 2002 Genetic structure of human populations Science 298 2381 2385 12493913
  30. Samuels SM 1965 On the number of successes in independent trials Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36 1272 1278
  31. Spencer Q (forthcoming) Philosophy of race meets population genetics Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 25963045
  32. Spitze K 1993 Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation Genetics 135 367 374 8244001 PMC1205642
  33. Tal O 2012 The cumulative effect of genetic markers on classification performance: Insights from simple models Journal of Theoretical Biology 293 206 218 22004997
  34. Tang H Quertermous T Rodriguez B Kardia SLR Zhu X Brown A 2005 Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies American Journal of Human Genetics 76 268 275 15625622 PMC1196372
  35. Whitlock MC 1999 Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation Genetical Research 74 215 221 10689799
  36. Whitlock MC 2008 Evolutionary inference from QST Molecular Ecology 17 1885 1896 18363667

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edge, M. D., & Rosenberg, N. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Edge, Michael D.
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
52
Pages
32-45
ISSN
1369-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970865854
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 HG005855)
  • Stanford Center for Computational, Evolutionary, and Human Genomics
  • Stanford Graduate Fellowship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
human genetic variation, race, ancestry inference, quantitative traits, genetic differentiation, genetic loci, classification models, quantitative genetics
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Quantitative Trait Loci, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review