The DOI matches its Crossref record; 311 of the 322 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of novelty detection
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon introduces various uncertainties into the system's outcomes [4,5].”
From Software engineering challenges for machine learning applications: A literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,190
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Seel, N. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,482
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Fast algorithms for mining association rules
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1998) · Cited by 11,362
On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode
Parzen, E. (1962) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704472 · Cited by 10,715
Kohonen, T. (1990) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(98)00030-7 · Cited by 10,686
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1 · Cited by 9,881
Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994) · Very Large Data Bases · Cited by 9,454
Flagged first, then by citations
11 of the 322 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- H. Escalante, A comparison of outlier detection algorithms for machine learning, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications in Computing, Citeseer, 2005.
- Marsland, 2003, Novelty detection in learning systems, Neural Comput. Surv., 3, 157
- Bishop, 2006, vol. 4
- Bartkowiak, 2011, Anomaly, novelty, one-class classification, Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manage. Appl., 3, 61
- Y. Gatsoulis, E. Kerr, J. Condell, N. Siddique, T. McGinnity, Novelty detection for cumulative learning, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, 2010, pp. 62–67.
- E. Kerr, Y. Gatsoulis, N.H. Siddique, J.V. Condell, T.M. McGinnity, Brief overview of novelty detection methods for robotic cumulative learning, in: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, 2010, pp. 171–180.
- McLachlan, 1988, vol. 1
- Embrechts, 1997, vol. 33
- Sugiyama, 2010, Density ratio estimation, RIMS Kokyuroku, 10
- Basseville, 1993, vol. 104
- Zhou, 2011, Unsupervised distributed novelty detection on scientific simulation data, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 7, 1533
- Hassan, 2012, A heuristic approach for sensor network outlier detection, Int. J. Res. Rev. Wirel. Sensor Netw. (IJRRWSN), 1, 66
- Labib, 2002, NSOM, Netw. Secur., 1
- Jolliffe, 2002, vol. 2
- W. Hu, Y. Liao, V. Vemuri, Robust anomaly detection using support vector machines, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2003, pp. 282–289.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Skip-GANomaly: Skip Connected and Adversarially Trained Encoder-Decoder Anomaly Detection
Akcay, S., Atapour-Abarghouei, A., & Breckon, T. P. (2019) · 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851808 · Cited by 103
“Recently, the existing literature within the field has grown considerably, leading to a proliferation of taxonomy papers [1]–[5].”
BackgroundMoshrefzadeh, A. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107153 · Cited by 101
Efficiency of different measures for defining the applicability domain of classification models
Klingspohn, W., Mathea, M., ter Laak, A., Heinrich, N., & Baumann, K. (2017) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0230-2 · Cited by 102
Podgorelec, B., Turkanović, M., & Karakatič, S. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20010147 · Cited by 104
A deep learning and novelty detection framework for rapid phenotyping in high-content screening
Sommer, C., Hoefler, R., Samwer, M., & Gerlich, D. W. (2017) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e17-05-0333 · Cited by 99
Stochastic earned value analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and statistical learning techniques
Acebes, F., Pereda, M., Poza, D., Pajares, J., & Galán, J. M. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.012 · Cited by 120
Health indicator for machine condition monitoring built in the latent space of a deep autoencoder
González, A., Díaz, I., Cuadrado, A. A., & García-Pérez, D. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108482 · Cited by 104
Variational autoencoders for anomalous jet tagging
Cheng, T., Arguin, J.-F., Leissner-Martin, J., Pilette, J., & Golling, T. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.016002 · Cited by 97
BINet: Multi-perspective business process anomaly classification
Nolle, T., Luettgen, S., Seeliger, A., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2019) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2019.101458 · Cited by 106
Anomaly Detection Methods for Categorical Data
Taha, A., & Hadi, A. S. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3312739 · Cited by 107
Uncertainty quantification in drug design
Mervin, L., Johansson, S., Semenova, E., Giblin, K. A., & Engkvist, O. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.11.027 · Cited by 100
Pereira, A. A., Pereira, J. M. C., Libonati, R., Oom, D., SETZER, A. W., Morelli, F., Machado‐Silva, F., & de Carvalho, L. M. T. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9111161 · Cited by 94
Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., & Behkamal, B. (2023) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110676 · Cited by 93
Modal Strain Energy-based Structural Damage Identification: A Review and Comparative Study
Wang, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Structural Engineering International · doi:10.1080/10168664.2018.1507607 · Cited by 92
Ultrasound-based identification of damage in wind turbine blades using novelty detection
de Oliveira, M. A., Filho, E. F. D. S., Albuquerque, M. C. S., Santos, Y. T. B., da Silva, I. C., & Farias, C. T. T. (2020) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106166 · Cited by 89
BINet: Multivariate Business Process Anomaly Detection Using Deep Learning
Nolle, T., Seeliger, A., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_16 · Cited by 90
Daneshvar, M. H., & Sarmadi, H. (2022) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114059 · Cited by 88
Sarmadi, H., & Yuen, K. (2022) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109049 · Cited by 87
Jung, D., & Sundström, C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2017.2773514 · Cited by 86
Clustering-based novelty detection for identification of non-technical losses
Viegas, J. L., Esteves, P. R., & Vieira, S. M. (2018) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.03.031 · Cited by 90
Bayesian‐optimized unsupervised learning approach for structural damage detection
Eltouny, K., & Liang, X. P. (2021) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12680 · Cited by 86
Radio Frequency Fingerprinting on the Edge
Jian, T., Gong, Y., Zhan, Z., Shi, R., Soltani, N., Wang, Z., Dy, J., Chowdhury, K. R., Wang, Y., & Ioannidis, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.3064466 · Cited by 92
Gaussian Anomaly Detection by Modeling the Distribution of Normal Data in Pretrained Deep Features
Rippel, O., Mertens, P., Konig, E., & Merhof, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3098381 · Cited by 88
State-of-the-art on clustering data streams
Ghesmoune, M., Lebbah, M., & Azzag, H. (2016) · Big Data Analytics · doi:10.1186/s41044-016-0011-3 · Cited by 83
Zero-shot versus Many-shot: Unsupervised Texture Anomaly Detection
Aota, T., Tong, L. T. T., & Okatani, T. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00552 · Cited by 84
Rethinking Reconstruction Autoencoder-Based Out-of-Distribution Detection
Zhou, Y. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00723 · Cited by 83
Robust detection of unknown DoS/DDoS attacks in IoT networks using a hybrid learning model
Nguyen, X.-H., & Le, K.-H. (2023) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2023.100851 · Cited by 96
Deep Recurrent Neural Network-Based Autoencoders for Acoustic Novelty Detection
Marchi, E., Vesperini, F., Squartini, S., & Schuller, B. W. (2017) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2017/4694860 · Cited by 84
Software engineering challenges for machine learning applications: A literature review
Kumeno, F. (2020) · Intelligent Decision Technologies · doi:10.3233/idt-190160 · Cited by 81
Towards robust voice pathology detection
Harár, P., Galáž, Z., Alonso, J. B., Mekyska, J., Burget, R., & Smékal, Z. (2018) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-018-3464-7 · Cited by 80
Anomaly detection in mixed telemetry data using a sparse representation and dictionary learning
Pilastre, B., Boussouf, L., d’Escrivan, S., & Tourneret, J. (2019) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107320 · Cited by 79
Bigoni, C., & Hesthaven, J. S. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.112896 · Cited by 88
Deep Residual Flow for Out of Distribution Detection
Zisselman, E., & Tamar, A. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01401 · Cited by 83
Denoising diffusion models for out-of-distribution detection
Graham, M. S., Pinaya, W. H. L., Tudosiu, P.-D., Nachev, P., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Cardoso, M. J. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00296 · Cited by 106
Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection with an Application to Water Analytics
Vercruyssen, V., Meert, W., Verbruggen, G., Maes, K., Bäumer, R., & Davis, J. J. (2018) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2018.00068 · Cited by 78
Socoró, J. C., Álías, F., & Alsina‐Pagès, R. M. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17102323 · Cited by 83
Mohammadian Rad, N., Van Laarhoven, T., Furlanello, C., & Marchiori, E. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18103533 · Cited by 76
Hierarchical Novelty Detection for Visual Object Recognition
Lee, K., Lee, K., Min, K., Zhang, Y., Shin, J., & Lee, H. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00114 · Cited by 80
Devi, D., Biswas, S. K., & Purkayastha, B. (2019) · Connection Science · doi:10.1080/09540091.2018.1560394 · Cited by 73
Entezami, A., Sarmadi, H., Behkamal, B., & Mariani, S. (2024) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111984 · Cited by 72
Oehling, J., & Barry, D. J. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.018 · Cited by 79
Learning Representations from Healthcare Time Series Data for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection
Pereira, J., & Silveira, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp.2019.8679157 · Cited by 77
Selection Features and Support Vector Machine for Credit Card Risk Identification
Rtayli, N., & Enneya, N. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.012 · Cited by 71
Anomaly detection with variational quantum generative adversarial networks
Herr, D., Obert, B., & Rosenkranz, M. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac0d4d · Cited by 83
Systematization of Corner Cases for Visual Perception in Automated Driving
Breitenstein, J., Termöhlen, J.-A., Lipinski, D., & Fingscheidt, T. (2020) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv47402.2020.9304789 · Cited by 76
Subspace Support Vector Data Description
Sohrab, F., Raitoharju, J., Gabbouj, M., & Iosifidis, A. (2018) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2018.8545819 · Cited by 71
Carreño, A., Inza, I., & Lozano, J. A. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09771-y · Cited by 68
Detecting Out-of-Distribution Inputs to Deep Generative Models Using TypicalityPreprint
Nalisnick, E., Matsukawa, A., Teh, Y. W., & Lakshminarayanan, B. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02994 · Cited by 107
A general anomaly detection framework for fleet-based condition monitoring of machines
Hendrickx, K., Meert, W., Mollet, Y., Gyselinck, J. J. C., Cornelis, B., Gryllias, K., & Davis, J. J. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106585 · Cited by 70
Machine learning for anomaly detection in particle physics
Belis, V., Odagiu, P., & Aarrestad, T. K. (2024) · Reviews in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.revip.2024.100091 · Cited by 111
Real-Time Nonparametric Anomaly Detection in High-Dimensional Settings
Kurt, M. N., Yılmaz, Y., & Wang, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2970410 · Cited by 69
Artificial intelligence and physics-based anomaly detection in the smart grid: A survey
Gaggero, G. B., Girdinio, P., & Marchese, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3537410 · Cited by 67
Automated identification of benthic epifauna with computer vision
Piechaud, N., Hunt, C., Culverhouse, P. F., Foster, N. L., & Howell, K. L. (2019) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12925 · Cited by 69
Unsupervised machine and deep learning methods for structural damage detection: A comparative study
Wang, Z., & Cha, Y. (2022) · Engineering Reports · doi:10.1002/eng2.12551 · Cited by 71
Gesture-Based Human–Machine Interaction: Taxonomy, Problem Definition, and Analysis
Carfì, A., & Mastrogiovanni, F. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2021.3129119 · Cited by 70
CAE: Contextual auto-encoder for multivariate time-series anomaly detection in air transportation
Chevrot, A., Vernotte, A., & Legeard, B. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102652 · Cited by 74
Non-parametric empirical machine learning for short-term and long-term structural health monitoring
Entezami, A., Shariatmadar, H., & Michele, C. D. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211069842 · Cited by 69
Minimal infrequent pattern based approach for mining outliers in data streams
Hemalatha, C. S., Vaidehi, V., & Lakshmi, R. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.053 · Cited by 66
Robust methods of inclusive outlier analysis for structural health monitoring
Dervilis, N., Cross, E. J., Barthorpe, R. J., & Keith Worden, B. (2014) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2014.05.012 · Cited by 66
Garmaroodi, M. S. S., Farivar, F., Haghighi, M. S., Shoorehdeli, M. A., & Jolfaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3034311 · Cited by 65
Ko, T., Lee, J. H., Cho, H., Cho, S., Lee, W., & Lee, M. (2017) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-06-2016-0195 · Cited by 65
OLE: Orthogonal Low-rank Embedding, A Plug and Play Geometric Loss for Deep Learning
Lezama, J., Qiu, Q., Musé, P., & Sapiro, G. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00846 · Cited by 72
Anomaly detection with the Switching Kalman Filter for structural health monitoring
Nguyen, L. H., & Goulet, J.-A. (2018) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2136 · Cited by 65
Detection and identification of significant events in historical aircraft trajectory data
Olivé, X., & Basora, L. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.102737 · Cited by 63
A Systematic Literature Review on Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks
Safaei, M., Asadi, S., Driss, M., Boulila, W., Alsaeedi, A., Chizari, H., Abdullah, R., & Safaei, M. (2020) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym12030328 · Cited by 65
Metric Learning for Novelty and Anomaly DetectionPreprint
Masana, M., Ruiz, I., Serrat, J., van de Weijer, J., & López, A. M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.05492 · Cited by 85
Towards a data-driven adaptive anomaly detection system for human activity
Yahaya, S., Lotfi, A., & Mahmud, M. (2021) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2021.02.006 · Cited by 44
Zhang, X., Chan, F. T. S., & Mahadevan, S. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108418 · Cited by 71
Self-Attentive, Multi-Context One-Class Classification for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection on Text
Ruff, L., Zemlyanskiy, Y., Vandermeulen, R. A., Schnake, T., & Kloft, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1398 · Cited by 70
Recurrent Neural Radio Anomaly DetectionPreprint
O’Shea, T. J., Clancy, T. C., & McGwier, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.00301 · Cited by 62
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Stream Data with Online Evolving Spiking Neural Networks
Maciąg, P. S., Kryszkiewicz, M., Bembenik, R., Lobo, J. L., & Ser, J. D. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.02.017 · Cited by 61
Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detection Based on Deep Learning: A Review
Cui, P., & Wang, J. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11213500 · Cited by 66
Huang, H., Yi, T., & Li, H. (2015) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000572 · Cited by 61
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Noisy Business Process Event Logs Using Denoising Autoencoders
Nolle, T., Seeliger, A., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46307-0_28 · Cited by 61
Gritsenko, A., Wang, Z., Jian, T., Dy, J., Chowdhury, K. R., & Ioannidis, S. (2019) · IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks · doi:10.1109/dyspan.2019.8935862 · Cited by 61
FUENTES, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R. S., Marshall, M., Wheals, J. C., & Cross, E. J. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.019 · Cited by 60
Taxonomy of machine learning paradigms: A data‐centric perspective
Emmert‐Streib, F., & Dehmer, M. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1470 · Cited by 88
Specifics of medical data mining for diagnosis aid: A survey
Itani, S., Lecron, F., & Fortemps, P. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.056 · Cited by 62
A One-Class Generative Adversarial Detection Framework for Multifunctional Fault Diagnoses
Pu, Z., Cabrera, D. R., Bai, Y., & Li, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2021.3108719 · Cited by 61
Wu, W., Zheng, Y., Chen, K., Wang, X., & Cao, N. (2018) · IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium · doi:10.1109/pacificvis.2018.00026 · Cited by 59
Image Anomalies: A Review and Synthesis of Detection Methods
Ehret, T., Davy, A., Morel, J., & Delbracio, M. (2019) · Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision · doi:10.1007/s10851-019-00885-0 · Cited by 59
MorphoCluster: Efficient Annotation of Plankton Images by Clustering
Schröder, S., Kiko, R., & Koch, R. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20113060 · Cited by 70
Fusion of Scores in a Detection Context Based on Alpha Integration
Soriano, A., Vergara, L., Bouziane, A., & Salazar, A. (2015) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00766 · Cited by 58
Performance Evaluation of Techniques for Identifying Abnormal Energy Consumption in Buildings
Gaur, M., Makonin, S., Bajić, I. V., & Majumdar, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2915641 · Cited by 58
Fuse, T., & Kamiya, K. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2674684 · Cited by 57
An Overview of Audio Event Detection Methods from Feature Extraction to Classification
Babaee, E., Anuar, N. B., Wahab, A. W. A., Shamshirband, S., & Chronopoulos, A. T. (2017) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2018.1430469 · Cited by 57
Improving one class support vector machine novelty detection scheme using nonlinear features
Sadooghi, M. S., & Khadem, S. E. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.05.002 · Cited by 57
Yue, N., & Aliabadi, M. H. (2020) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921720940642 · Cited by 57
Schweidtmann, A. M., Weber, J. M., Wende, C., Netze, L., & Mitsos, A. (2021) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11081-021-09608-0 · Cited by 62
Santis, E. D., Livi, L., Sadeghian, A., & Rizzi, A. (2015) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.05.112 · Cited by 60
Detecting anomalous structures by convolutional sparse models
Carrera, D., Boracchi, G., Foi, A., & Wohlberg, B. E. (2015) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2015.7280790 · Cited by 57
Learning deep structured network for weakly supervised change detection
Khan, S. H., He, X., Porikli, F., Bennamoun, M., Sohel, F. A., & Togneri, R. B. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/279 · Cited by 57
Acoustic novelty detection with adversarial autoencoders
Principi, E., Vesperini, F., Squartini, S., & Piazza, F. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966273 · Cited by 60
A Systematic Review of Anomaly Detection for Business Process Event Logs
Ko, J., & Comuzzi, M. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00794-y · Cited by 56
An unsupervised machine learning approach for real-time damage detection in bridges
Bayane, I., Leander, J., & Karoumi, R. (2024) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117971 · Cited by 63
Kim, J., & Lee, C. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.006 · Cited by 62
Jo, I., Kim, J., Kang, H., Kim, Y., & Choi, S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8461700 · Cited by 56
Combination of research questions and methods: A new measurement of scientific novelty
Luo, Z., Lu, W. P., He, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101282 · Cited by 65
Local Novelty Detection in Multi-class Recognition Problems
Bodesheim, P., Freytag, A., Rodner, E., & Denzler, J. (2015) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv.2015.113 · Cited by 53
Incremental Kernel Null Space Discriminant Analysis for Novelty Detection
Liu, J., Lian, Z., Wang, Y., & Xiao, J. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.439 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Pimentel, M. A. F., Clifton, D. A., Clifton, L., & Tarassenko, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pimentel, Marco A.F.
- Venue
- Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 215-249
- ISSN
- 0165-1684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115627867
- Cited by
- 1,649
- References
- 322
- Citations by year
- 2026: 94 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 77.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
- Keywords
- novelty detection, one-class classification, anomaly detection, critical systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review