Cited by 434Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness Research

An efficacy, safety, and dose–response study of Ramelteon in patients with chronic primary insomnia

ERMAN, M, SEIDEN, D, ZAMMIT, G, SAINATI, S, ZHANG, J·2006·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background and purpose To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose response of Ramelteon, a novel highly selective MT1/MT2 receptor agonist, in patients with chronic primary insomnia. Patients and methods A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-period crossover study design was performed. A total of 107 patients, aged 18-64 years, were randomized into a dosing sequence that included 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg of Ramelteon and placebo. Patients received all five treatments, with a 5- to 12-day washout period between treatments, and served as their own controls. Medication was administered 30 min before habitual bedtime and polysomnographic monitoring. Next-day residual effects were assessed with two visual analog scales (mood and feeling), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), word-list memory tests (immediate recall and delayed recall), and a post-sleep questionnaire that ascertained patients' alertness and ability to concentrate. Results All tested doses of Ramelteon resulted in statistically significant reductions in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and increases in total sleep time (TST). No next-day residual effects were apparent at any dose, as compared with placebo. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events between any active treatment and placebo group. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, somnolence, and sore throat. Conclusions Ramelteon demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in LPS and a sta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2005.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of the short/intermediate-acting BzRAs (zaleplon, zolpidem, eszopiclone, triazolam, temazepam) has been shown to have positive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebo-controlled trials.

    “each has been shown to have posi -tive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebocontrolled trials. 32-37”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 434

Authors
ERMAN, M., SEIDEN, D., ZAMMIT, G., SAINATI, S., & ZHANG, J.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
ERMAN, M
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141981531
Cited by
434
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
35.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
ramelteon, chronic primary insomnia, melatonin receptor agonists, dose-response relationship, sleep latency, total sleep time, drug safety, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Indenes, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review