An efficacy, safety, and dose–response study of Ramelteon in patients with chronic primary insomnia
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose response of Ramelteon, a novel highly selective MT1/MT2 receptor agonist, in patients with chronic primary insomnia. Patients and methods A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-period crossover study design was performed. A total of 107 patients, aged 18-64 years, were randomized into a dosing sequence that included 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg of Ramelteon and placebo. Patients received all five treatments, with a 5- to 12-day washout period between treatments, and served as their own controls. Medication was administered 30 min before habitual bedtime and polysomnographic monitoring. Next-day residual effects were assessed with two visual analog scales (mood and feeling), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), word-list memory tests (immediate recall and delayed recall), and a post-sleep questionnaire that ascertained patients' alertness and ability to concentrate. Results All tested doses of Ramelteon resulted in statistically significant reductions in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and increases in total sleep time (TST). No next-day residual effects were apparent at any dose, as compared with placebo. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events between any active treatment and placebo group. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, somnolence, and sore throat. Conclusions Ramelteon demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in LPS and a sta…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each of the short/intermediate-acting BzRAs (zaleplon, zolpidem, eszopiclone, triazolam, temazepam) has been shown to have positive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebo-controlled trials.
“each has been shown to have posi -tive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebocontrolled trials. 32-37”
From Clinical Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Insomnia in Adults (2008) · cites this paper as [35]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 434
- Authors
- ERMAN, M., SEIDEN, D., ZAMMIT, G., SAINATI, S., & ZHANG, J.
- Affiliations
- St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
- Takeda (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- ERMAN, M
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141981531
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 35.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- ramelteon, chronic primary insomnia, melatonin receptor agonists, dose-response relationship, sleep latency, total sleep time, drug safety, adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Indenes, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review