Cited by 48Sleep and related disordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Challenging the myth of REM sleep behavior disorder: no evidence of heightened aggressiveness in dreams

D’Agostino, Armando, Manni, Raffaele, Limosani, Ivan, Terzaghi, Michele, Cavallotti, Simone, Scarone, Silvio·2012·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objectives Dreams are commonly described as violent, threatening, and aggressive in patients with REM behavior disorder (RBD), but very few studies have directly investigated dream content in this population. We systematically assessed dreams in subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic RBD (iRBD) and explored psychological traits within the group with specific focus on aggressiveness. Methods A total of 129 dream reports was collected, of which 77 belonged to 12 iRBD patients and 52 belonged to 12 control subjects. Transcripts were analyzed with measures of both form and content. The Thematic Apperception Test was used to assess patients' personality traits and to yield information on formal aspects of waking thought processes. Results No statistically significant differences were found between the dreams of iRBD patients and those of normal controls in any of the applied measures. In wakefulness, passivity was found to differ between the two populations and was being higher in the iRBD group (F(9,14)=4.84, p<0.05). Conclusions Our results do not support the anecdotal view that dreams of RBD patients contain more aggressive elements than those of the general population. However, over 80% of the patients were on treatment at the time of data collection. The "mild" waking temperament could be interpreted as an early subtle sign of the apathy that is commonly described in the context of neurodegenerative disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.01.017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RBD dreams appear to contain abnormally high levels of aggression.

    “RBD dreams appear to contain abnormally high levels of aggression (Fantini et al., 2005;but see D'Agostino et al., 2012;Oudiette et al., 2009).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as D'Agostino et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D’Agostino, A., Manni, R., Limosani, I., Terzaghi, M., Cavallotti, S., & Scarone, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT)
  • Ospedale San Paolo (IT)
Corresponding author
D’Agostino, Armando
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
714-719
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103181598
Cited by
48
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
REM sleep behavior disorder, dream content, dream narrative, Thematic Apperception Test, personality traits, passivity, apathy, neurodegenerative diseases, idiopathic RBD
MeSH terms
Aged, Aggression, Dreams, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Inventory, Sleep, REM, Thematic Apperception Test, Violence, REM Sleep Behavior Disorder, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review