Cited by 45Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Is portable monitoring accurate in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in chronic pulmonary obstructive disease?

Oliveira, Marcia Gonçalves, Nery, Luiz Eduardo, Santos-Silva, Rogerio, Sartori, Denis Eduardo, Alonso, Fabiana Fernanda, Togeiro, Sonia Maria, Tufik, Sergio, Bittencourt, Lia·2012·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background No scientific evidence supports the use of portable devices to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in patients with co-morbities. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a portable monitoring device (Stardust - STD) in the detection of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Patients with COPD and clinical suspicion of OSAS were recruited for a prospective randomized study. The STD was used on two different nights: (1) at home (STDHome) and (2) at the sleep laboratory simultaneous with polysomnography (PSG-STDLab). Results A total of 72 patients underwent the proposed recordings. Forty-six volunteers were excluded due to recording problems, and data from 26 subjects were analyzed. The mean age was (mean±SD) 62.8±8.5 years, 50% were male, and the mean forced expiratory volume in the first second was 55±11%. Significant intraclass correlation was observed between apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-PSG vs. AHI-STDLab (r=0.61, p Conclusion Despite the agreement found in a small number of patients between AHI, a large number of failures in the recording limits the use of this portable device for the diagnosis of OSAS in patients with COPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2012.06.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, M. G., Nery, L. E., Santos-Silva, R., Sartori, D. E., Alonso, F. F., Togeiro, S. M., Tufik, S., & Bittencourt, L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Bittencourt, Lia
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1033-1038
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066412597
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, home sleep monitoring, home sleep testing, diagnostic accuracy, apnea-hypopnea index, polysomnography comparison, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Polysomnography, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review