Night-shift work increases morbidity of breast cancer and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 16 prospective cohort studies
Abstract
Night-shift work (NSW) has previously been related to incidents of breast cancer and all-cause mortality, but many published studies have reported inconclusive results. The aim of the present study was to quantify a potential dose-effect relationship between NSW and morbidity of breast cancer, and to evaluate the association between NSW and risk of all-cause mortality. The outcomes included NSW, morbidity of breast cancer, cardiovascular mortality, cancer-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. Sixteen investigations were included, involving 2,020,641 participants, 10,004 incident breast cancer cases, 7185 cancer-related deaths, 4820 cardiovascular end points, and 2480 all-cause mortalities. The summary risk ratio (RR) of incident breast cancer for an increase of NSW was 1.057 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.014-1.102; test for heterogeneity p = 0.358, I(2) = 9.2%]. The combined RR (95% CI) of breast cancer risk for NSW vs daytime work was: 1.029 (0.969-1.093) in the <5-year subgroup, 1.019 (1.001-1.038) for 5-year incremental risk, 1.025 (1.006-1.044) for 5- to 10-year exposure times, 1.074 (1.010-1.142) in the 10- to 20-year subgroup, and 1.088 (1.012-1.169) for >20-year exposure lengths. The overall RR was 1.089 (95% CI 1.016-1.166) in a fixed-effects model (test for heterogeneity p = 0.838, I(2) = 0%) comparing rotating NSW and day work. Night-shift work was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death (RR 1.027, 95% CI 1.001-1.053), and all-cause death 1.253 (95% CI 0.786-1.997). In summary, NSW increased the risk of breast cancer morbidity by: 1.9% for 5 years, 2.5% for 5-10 years, 7.4% for 10-20 years, and 8.8% for >20-years of NSW. Additionally, rotating NSW enhanced the morbidity of breast cancer by 8.9%. Moreover, NSW was associated with a 2.7% increase in cardiovascular death.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies report an association between shift work exposure and increased breast cancer risk.
“That said, many studies have reported an association between shift work exposure and increased risk of breast cancer [59,60].”
From Shift Work: Disrupted Circadian Rhythms and Sleep—Implications for Health and Well-being (2017) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Lin, X., Chen, W., Wei, F., Ying, M., Wei, W., & Xie, X.
- Affiliations
- Fujian Medical University (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xie, Xiaoming
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1381-1387
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166776561
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- night shift work, breast cancer risk, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, dose-response relationship, exposure duration, rotating shifts, occupational risk factors, circadian rhythm disruption, sleep deprivation, cardiovascular risk factors, cancer risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Mortality, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review