Reading from an iPad or from a book in bed: The impact on human sleep. A randomized controlled crossover trial
Abstract
Objective To objectively and subjectively compare whether reading a story for 30 min from an iPad or from a book in bed prior to sleep will differentially affect sleep.Methods Sixteen students (12 females, mean age 25.1 ± 2.9 years) underwent ambulatory (sleeping in their own beds at home) polysomnographic (PSG) recordings in a counterbalanced crossover design consisting of three PSG nights (one adaptation night, two test nights) and two different reading materials: read from an iPad or from a book. Illumination was measured during reading and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale was completed prior to turning the light off. Sleep diaries were kept to assess subjective sleep parameters from day to day.Results Illumination was higher in the iPad condition compared to the book condition (58.3 ± 6.9 vs 26.7 ± 8.0 lux, p <0.001). Reading a story from an iPad decreased subjective sleepiness, delayed the EEG dynamics of slow wave activity by approximately 30 min, and reduced slow wave activity after sleep onset compared to reading from a book. No parameters of sleep state timing and sleep onset latency differed between the two reading conditions.Conclusion Although there was no direct effect on time spent in different sleep states and self-reported sleep onset latency, the use of an iPad which emits blue enriched light impinges acutely on sleepiness and EEG characteristics of sleep pressure. Hence, the use of commercially available tablets may have consequences in terms of alertness, circadian physiology, and sleep.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reading from a tablet instead of a printed book for 30 min before bedtime reduced SWA selectively during the first 2 h of sleep.
“reading from a tablet instead of reading a printed book for 30 min before bedtime reduced SWA selectively during the first 2 h of sleep [38].”
From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
The results on SWS and SWA as indices of sleep pressure are in line with existing literature.
“These results on SWS and SWA as indices of sleep pressure [56,57] are well in line with existing literature [6,37,38].”
From Preliminary Results: The Impact of Smartphone Use and Short-Wavelength Light during the Evening on Circadian Rhythm, Sleep and Alertness (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Grønli, J., Byrkjedal, I. K., Bjorvatn, B., Nødtvedt, Ø., Hamre, B., & Pallesen, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Washington State University (US)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Grønli, Janne
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2290812629
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 16.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- iPad, e-books, blue light, sleepiness, slow-wave activity, sleep pressure, sleep latency, circadian rhythm, screen time
- MeSH terms
- Sleep Hygiene, Adult, Beds, Books, Female, Humans, Lighting, Male, Reading, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies, Computers, Handheld
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review