Cited by 103Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Reading from an iPad or from a book in bed: The impact on human sleep. A randomized controlled crossover trial

Grønli, Janne, Byrkjedal, Ida Kristiansen, Bjorvatn, Bjørn, Nødtvedt, Øystein, Hamre, Børge, Pallesen, Ståle·2016·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Objective To objectively and subjectively compare whether reading a story for 30 min from an iPad or from a book in bed prior to sleep will differentially affect sleep.Methods Sixteen students (12 females, mean age 25.1 ± 2.9 years) underwent ambulatory (sleeping in their own beds at home) polysomnographic (PSG) recordings in a counterbalanced crossover design consisting of three PSG nights (one adaptation night, two test nights) and two different reading materials: read from an iPad or from a book. Illumination was measured during reading and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale was completed prior to turning the light off. Sleep diaries were kept to assess subjective sleep parameters from day to day.Results Illumination was higher in the iPad condition compared to the book condition (58.3 ± 6.9 vs 26.7 ± 8.0 lux, p <0.001). Reading a story from an iPad decreased subjective sleepiness, delayed the EEG dynamics of slow wave activity by approximately 30 min, and reduced slow wave activity after sleep onset compared to reading from a book. No parameters of sleep state timing and sleep onset latency differed between the two reading conditions.Conclusion Although there was no direct effect on time spent in different sleep states and self-reported sleep onset latency, the use of an iPad which emits blue enriched light impinges acutely on sleepiness and EEG characteristics of sleep pressure. Hence, the use of commercially available tablets may have consequences in terms of alertness, circadian physiology, and sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 103

Authors
Grønli, J., Byrkjedal, I. K., Bjorvatn, B., Nødtvedt, Ø., Hamre, B., & Pallesen, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Grønli, Janne
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
21
Pages
86-92
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2290812629
Cited by
103
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
16.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
iPad, e-books, blue light, sleepiness, slow-wave activity, sleep pressure, sleep latency, circadian rhythm, screen time
MeSH terms
Sleep Hygiene, Adult, Beds, Books, Female, Humans, Lighting, Male, Reading, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Cross-Over Studies, Computers, Handheld

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review