Predictors of poor sleep quality in multiple sclerosis: The independent role of anxiety and restless legs syndrome
Abstract
Study objectives Sleep disturbances are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and significantly affect patients' quality of life. However, the specific predictors of poor sleep quality in MS remain underexplored. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of poor sleep quality and to identify clinical and psychological factors independently associated with poor sleep in patients with MS. Methods This cross-sectional observational study included 103 consecutively enrolled MS patients during a one-month recruitment period. Sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), with scores >5 indicating poor sleep. Other measures included the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) scales. Participants were grouped as good or poor sleepers, and predictors of poor sleep were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Results Poor sleep quality was identified in 53.4 % of patients. Poor sleepers had significantly higher ISI, ESS, FSS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and S-LANSS scores and reported lower EQ-5D-3L-based quality of life (all p Conclusions Poor sleep is prevalent in MS and independently associated with anxiety symptoms and RLS. These findings highlight the need for targeted screening and treatment of these comorbidities to improve sleep and overa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity analysis removing lower clinical extremes for low disability, duration, and progression did not affect the conclusions, yielding 20.5% (95% CI 15.4-25.6), indicating no clear impact.
“After removing lower clinical extremes (Aliş et al. 2025; Ismail et al. 2025; Jallouli, Ghroubi, Ben Dhia, et al. 2025), the overall sensitivity analysis for low disability, duration, and progression similarly did not affect the conclusions (20.5% [95% CI: 15.4; 25.6]), indicating no clear impact.”
From The Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Using the <scp>NeuPSIG</scp> Algorithm (2026) · cites this paper as Aliş et al. 2025
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 30 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Alis, C., Kose, N., Sen Kilic, S., Genc, G., & Bulut, S.
- Affiliations
- Şişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 134
- Pages
- 106691
- ISSN
- 1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412555379
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, sleep quality, restless legs syndrome, anxiety, insomnia, predictors of poor sleep, sleep disorders, quality of life, depression, fatigue, neuropathic pain, disability
- MeSH terms
- Sleep Quality, Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Restless Legs Syndrome, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Wake Disorders, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review