Cited by 157Sleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Sleeping with technology: cognitive, affective, and technology usage predictors of sleep problems among college students

Rosen, Larry, Carrier, Louis M., Miller, Aimee, Rokkum, Jeffrey, Ruiz, Abraham·2016·Sleep Health

Abstract

Objectives Sleep problems related to technology affect college students through several potential mechanisms including displacement of sleep due to technology use, executive functioning abilities, and the impact of emotional states related to stress and anxiety about technology availability.Design In the present study, cognitive and affective factors that influence technology usage were examined for their impact upon sleep problems.Participants and measurements More than 700 US college students completed an online questionnaire addressing technology usage, anxiety/dependence, executive functioning, nighttime phone usage, bedtime phone location, and sleep problems.Results A path model controlling for background variables was tested using the data. The results showed that executive dysfunction directly predicted sleep problems as well as affected sleep problems through nighttime awakenings. In addition, anxiety/dependence increased daily smartphone usage and also increased nighttime awakenings, which, in turn, affected sleep problems.Conclusions Thus, both the affective and cognitive factors that influence technology usage affected sleep problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.11.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphones can negatively impact well-being primarily by reducing the time spent doing other activities that are essential for well-being, such as sleeping or socializing.

    “From this perspective, smartphones can negatively impact well-being primarily by reducing the time we spend doing other activities that are essential for well-being, such as sleeping [18,19,20] or socializing [21].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 157

Authors
Rosen, L., Carrier, L. M., Miller, A., Rokkum, J., & Ruiz, A.
Affiliations
California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Corresponding author
Rosen, Larry
Venue
Sleep Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
49-56
ISSN
2352-7218 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2231230858
Cited by
157
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
sleep disorders, technology use, smartphone use, university students, executive function, executive dysfunction, anxiety, technology dependence, nocturnal awakenings, cognitive factors, emotional factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review