Cited by 857Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCollagen: Extraction and Characterization

Immune response to biologic scaffold materials

Open access
Badylak, Stephen F., Gilbert, Thomas W.·2008·Seminars in Immunology

Abstract

Biologic scaffold materials composed of mammalian extracellular matrix are commonly used in regenerative medicine and in surgical procedures for the reconstruction of numerous tissue and organs. These biologic materials are typically allogeneic or xenogeneic in origin and are derived from tissues such as small intestine, urinary bladder, dermis, and pericardium. The innate and acquired host immune response to these biologic materials and the effect of the immune response upon downstream remodeling events has been largely unexplored. Variables that affect the host response include manufacturing processes, the rate of scaffold degradation, and the presence of cross species antigens. This manuscript provides an overview of studies that have evaluated the immune response to biologic scaffold materials and variables that affect this response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Materials derived from mammalian tissue sources elicit a distinctly different host response than synthetic materials due to unique surface topologies and ligand landscapes.

    “Materials derived from mammalian tissue sources elicit a distinctly different host response than those composed of synthetic materials due to their unique surface topologies and ligand landscapes [152].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 857

Authors
Badylak, S. F., & Gilbert, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Badylak, Stephen F.
Venue
Seminars in Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
109-116
ISSN
1044-5323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008565536
Cited by
857
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 49
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM060691)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR054940)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB000506)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Keywords
biological scaffolds, extracellular matrix, host immune response, tissue regeneration, scaffold degradation, innate immunity, adaptive immunity, tissue remodeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Immunity, Lymphocyte Activation, Macrophage Activation, Swine, Trisaccharides, Antigens, Heterophile, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells, Tissue Engineering, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review