Secondary insomnia: A myth dismissed
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Historically, when insomnia has co-occurred in the presence of another disorder, it has commonly been conceptualized as a 'secondary' condition, which is precipitated and maintained by the assumed 'primary' disorder.
“Historically, when insomnia has co-occurred in the presence of another disorder, it has commonly been conceptualized as a ‘secondary’ condition, which is precipitated and maintained by the assumed ‘primary’ disorder [29].”
From Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA): Prevalence, consequences, methodological considerations, and recent randomized controlled trials (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Lichstein, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lichstein, Kenneth L.
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-5
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056086747
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- secondary insomnia, insomnia etiology, sleep disorders, misdiagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
