Non-circadian direct effects of light on sleep and alertness: Lessons from transgenic mouse models
Abstract
Light exerts a strong non-visual influence on human physiology and behavior. Additionally light is known to affect sleep indirectly through the phase shifting of circadian rhythms, and directly, promoting alertness in humans and sleep in nocturnal species. Little attention has been paid to the direct non-image-forming influence of light until recently with the discovery and emerging knowledge on melanopsin, a photopigment which is maximally sensitive to the blue spectrum of light and expressed in a subset of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Indeed, the development of transgenic mouse models targeting different phototransduction pathways has allowed researchers to decipher the mechanisms by which mammals adapt sleep to their light environment. This review summarizes the novel concepts and discrepancies from recent publications relating to the non-circadian effects of light on sleep and waking. Specifically, we discuss whether darkness, in addition to light, affects their quality. Furthermore, we seek to understand whether longer sustained periods of light exposure can influence sleep, if the direct photic regulation depends on time of day, and whether this affects the homeostatic sleep process. Moreover, the neural pathways by which light exerts a direct influence on sleep will be discussed including the respective role of rods/cones and melanopsin. Finally, we suggest that light weighs on the components of the flip-flop switch model to induce respectively sleep or waking, in nocturnal and diurnal animals. Taking these data into account we therefore propose a novel model of sleep regulation based on three processes; the direct photic regulation interacting with the circadian and homeostatic drives to determine the timing and quality of sleep and waking. An outlook of promising clinical and non-clinical applications of these findings will be considered as well as directions for future animal and human research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rod and cone encoded light stimuli were primarily involved in the promotion of the wake state, whereas melanopsin primarily evokes a higher level of alertness by mediating EEG correlates of waking associated cognitive processes.
“These conclusions reached further, as to suggest, that rod and cone encoded light stimuli were primarily involved in the promotion of the wake state, whereas melanopsin primarily evokes a higher level of alertness by mediating EEG correlates of waking associated cognitive processes 41.”
From The inner clock-Blue light sets the human rhythm (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Hubbard, J., Ruppert, E., Gropp, C.-M., & Bourgin, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Bourgin, Patrice
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 445-452
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100123460
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- non-visual effects of light, alertness, melanopsin, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, transgenic mouse model, rods and cones, time of day, homeostatic sleep drive, circadian rhythm
- MeSH terms
- Melanopsin, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Light, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Biological, Sleep, Vision, Ocular, Wakefulness, Rod Opsins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review