Cited by 324Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disorders

Chronotype and circadian rhythm in bipolar disorder: A systematic review

Open access
Melo, Matias C.A., Abreu, Rafael L.C., Linhares Neto, Vicente B., de Bruin, Pedro F.C., de Bruin, Veralice M.S.·2017·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Despite a complex relationship between mood, sleep and rhythm, the impact of circadian disruptions on bipolar disorder (BD) has not been clarified. The purpose of this systematic review was to define current evidence regarding chronotype and circadian rhythm patterns in BD patients. 42 studies were included, involving 3432 BD patients. Disruption of the biological rhythm was identified, even in drug-naïve BD patients and independently of mood status. Daily profiles of melatonin levels and cortisol indicated a delayed phase. Depression was more frequently associated with circadian alterations than euthymia. Few studies evaluated mania, demonstrating irregular rhythms. Evening type was more common in BD adults. Studies about the influence of chronotype on depressive symptoms showed conflicting results. Only one investigation observed the influences of chronotype in mania, revealing no significant association. Effects of psychoeducation and lithium on rhythm in BD patients were poorly studied, demonstrating no improvement of rhythm parameters. Studies about genetics are incipient. In conclusion, disruption in circadian rhythm and eveningness are common in BD. Prospective research evaluating the impact of circadian disruption on mood symptoms, metabolism, seasonality, the influence of age and the effects of mood stabilizers are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.06.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 324

Authors
Melo, M. C. A., Abreu, R. L. C., Linhares Neto, V. B., de Bruin, P. F. C., & de Bruin, V. M. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Corresponding author
Melo, Matias C.A.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
34
Pages
46-58
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2468086208
Cited by
324
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
bipolar disorder, chronotype, circadian rhythm, circadian rhythm disruption, eveningness, melatonin, cortisol, depression, mania, lithium, psychoeducation, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Circadian Rhythm, Depression, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Melatonin, Sleep, Chronobiology Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review