The role of sleep in regulating structural plasticity and synaptic strength: implications for memory and cognitive function
Open accessAbstract
Dendritic spines are the major sites of synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. Alterations in the strength of synaptic connections directly affect the neuronal communication, which is crucial for brain function as well as the processing and storage of information. Sleep and sleep loss bidirectionally alter structural plasticity, by affecting spine numbers and morphology, which ultimately can affect the functional output of the brain in terms of alertness, cognition, and mood. Experimental data from studies in rodents suggest that sleep deprivation may impact structural plasticity in different ways. One of the current views, referred to as the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis, suggests that wake promotes synaptic potentiation whereas sleep facilitates synaptic downscaling. On the other hand, several studies have now shown that sleep deprivation can reduce spine density and attenuate synaptic efficacy in the hippocampus. These data are the basis for the view that sleep promotes hippocampal structural plasticity critical for memory formation. Altogether, the impact of sleep and sleep loss may vary between regions of the brain. A better understanding of the role that sleep plays in regulating structural plasticity may ultimately lead to novel therapeutic approaches for brain disorders that are accompanied by sleep disturbances and sleep loss.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learning involves synaptic plasticity in both directions in both wake and sleep.
“indicating that learning involves synaptic plasticity in both directions in both wake and sleep.142”
From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [142]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 331
- Authors
- Raven, F., Van der Zee, E. A., Meerlo, P., & Havekes, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Havekes, Robbert
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 3-11
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2616001080
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- sleep, sleep deprivation, structural plasticity, dendritic spines, synaptic efficacy, synaptic homeostasis hypothesis, synaptic downscaling, synaptic potentiation, hippocampus, memory formation, cognitive function, sleep disorders
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cognition, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Dendritic Spines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review