Light treatment in depression: An antique treatment with new insights
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phototherapy is effective in treating depressive symptoms, and the sustained antidepressant effect of bright light therapy has been confirmed in clinical studies.
“Phototherapy is effective in treating depressive symptoms [39], and the sustained antidepressant effect of BLT has been confirmed in clinical studies [40,41].”
From Bright light therapy in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Geoffroy, P. A., Schroder, C. M., & Bourgin, P.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Geoffroy, Pierre A.
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 218-219
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793146022
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- phototherapy, depression, circadian rhythm, seasonal affective disorder, light exposure
- MeSH terms
- Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Phototherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
