Cited by 171Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The impact of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia on objective sleep parameters: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Mitchell, Laura J., Bisdounis, Lampros, Ballesio, Andrea, Omlin, Ximena, Kyle, Simon D.·2019·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

It is well-established that cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improves self-reported sleep disturbance, however the impact on objective sleep is less clear. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the impact of multi-component CBT-I on objective measures of sleep, indexed via polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy. Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Following appraisal for risk of bias, extracted data were meta-analysed using random-effects models. The quality of the literature was generally high, although reporting of methodological detail varied markedly between studies. Meta-analyses found no evidence that CBT-I reliably improves PSG-defined sleep parameters. Actigraphy evidence was more mixed; with a small effect for reduction in sleep onset latency (Hedge's g = -0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.51 to -0.05], p = 0.018) and a moderate effect for reduction in total sleep time (TST) (Hedge's g = -0.51 [95% CI -0.75 to -0.26], p < 0.001). In contrast, and consistent with recent meta-analyses, CBT-I was associated with robust improvements in diary measures of sleep initiation and maintenance (Hedge's g range = 0.50 to 0.79) but not TST. While the literature is small and still developing, the sleep benefits of CBT-I are more clearly expressed in the subjective versus objective domain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 171

Authors
Mitchell, L. J., Bisdounis, L., Ballesio, A., Omlin, X., & Kyle, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Kyle, Simon D.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
47
Pages
90-102
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951889707
Cited by
171
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Brain Research Organization
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Erasmus+
  • Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, polysomnography, actigraphy, sleep latency, total sleep time, sleep maintenance, sleep initiation
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Sleep, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review