Cited by 109Sleep and related disordersResilience and Mental HealthSleep and Wakefulness Research

A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between sleep duration/quality, mental toughness and resilience amongst healthy individuals

Arora, Teresa, Grey, Ian, Östlundh, Linda, Alamoodi, Asma, Omar, Omar M., Hubert Lam, Kin-Bong, Grandner, Michael·2022·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

The majority of sleep research has focused on deleterious health outcomes, with little attention to positive sequels. A systematic review of the literature regarding sleep duration and/or sleep quality in relation to mental toughness and resilience amongst non-clinical, healthy populations was completed. Eight databases and selected sources for grey literature were searched from their inception to April 2021. A total of 1925 unique records (1898 from the database search and 27 from grey sources) were identified and screened against the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 68 studies were eligible and 63 were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated a weak, positive correlation between sleep duration and resilience (r = 0.11, p < 0.001), and sleep quality (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). The pooled correlation was slightly attenuated for prospective studies pertaining to sleep quality and resilience (r = 0.18, p < 0.001). We found evidence of high publication bias for studies that explored the relationship between sleep quality and resilience. Sleep and resilience are positively correlated but additional research is needed to verify the direct relationship through carefully designed, prospective studies that capture both subjective and objective sleep estimates. For a more comprehensive understanding, complementary reviews that explore the sleep-resilience association are needed for clinical populations, and those who have suffered extreme hardship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101593

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 109

Authors
Arora, T., Grey, I., Östlundh, L., Alamoodi, A., Omar, O. M., Hubert Lam, K.-B., & Grandner, M.
Affiliations
  • Zayed University (AE)
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Grandner, Michael
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
62
Pages
101593
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210441366
Cited by
109
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep duration, sleep quality, mental toughness, resilience, healthy individuals, publication bias
MeSH terms
Sleep Quality, Health Status, Humans, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review