A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between sleep duration/quality, mental toughness and resilience amongst healthy individuals
Abstract
The majority of sleep research has focused on deleterious health outcomes, with little attention to positive sequels. A systematic review of the literature regarding sleep duration and/or sleep quality in relation to mental toughness and resilience amongst non-clinical, healthy populations was completed. Eight databases and selected sources for grey literature were searched from their inception to April 2021. A total of 1925 unique records (1898 from the database search and 27 from grey sources) were identified and screened against the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, 68 studies were eligible and 63 were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated a weak, positive correlation between sleep duration and resilience (r = 0.11, p < 0.001), and sleep quality (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). The pooled correlation was slightly attenuated for prospective studies pertaining to sleep quality and resilience (r = 0.18, p < 0.001). We found evidence of high publication bias for studies that explored the relationship between sleep quality and resilience. Sleep and resilience are positively correlated but additional research is needed to verify the direct relationship through carefully designed, prospective studies that capture both subjective and objective sleep estimates. For a more comprehensive understanding, complementary reviews that explore the sleep-resilience association are needed for clinical populations, and those who have suffered extreme hardship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sleep dysfunction influences the perception of stressors at a cognitive level, whereby poorer sleep is associated with lower resilience to stress.
“Importantly, sleep dysfunction not only affects the regulation of neuroendocrine stress systems directly but also influences the perception of stressors at a cognitive level, whereby poorer sleep is associated with lower resilience to stress.”
From Towards an Integrative Account of Potential Mechanisms Mediating the Path From Sleep Dysfunction to Hallucinations (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 102 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Arora, T., Grey, I., Östlundh, L., Alamoodi, A., Omar, O. M., Hubert Lam, K.-B., & Grandner, M.
- Affiliations
- Zayed University (AE)
- United Arab Emirates University (AE)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grandner, Michael
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 101593
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210441366
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- sleep duration, sleep quality, mental toughness, resilience, healthy individuals, publication bias
- MeSH terms
- Sleep Quality, Health Status, Humans, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review