A bidirectional model of sleep and technology use: A theoretical review of How much, for whom, and which mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
The link between technology and sleep is more complex than originally thought. In this updated theoretical review, we propose a new model informed by the growing body of evidence in the area over the past 10 years. The main theoretical change is the addition of bi-directional links between the use of technology and sleep problems. We begin by reviewing the evidence to date for the originally proposed mechanisms of bright light, arousal, nighttime sleep disruptions, and sleep displacement. Then, in support of the new direction of effect (sleep problems preceding technology use), we propose two new mechanisms: technology before sleep might be used as a time filler and/or as an emotional regulation strategy to facilitate the sleep-onset process. Finally, we present potential moderators of the association between technology and sleep, in recognition of protective and vulnerability factors that may mitigate or exacerbate the effects of technology on sleep and vice versa. The goal of this theoretical review is to update the field, guide future public health messages, and to prompt new research into how much technology and sleep affect each other, for whom it may be problematic, and which mechanisms may explain their association.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Bauducco, S., Pillion, M., Bartel, K., Reynolds, C., Kahn, M., & Gradisar, M.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Bauducco, Serena
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-08
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 101933
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4394824528
- Semantic Scholar
- b84145346ce0592aafa028a95de07c7b05e5455a
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 21
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Örebro University Library (Örebro University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsradet (2019-06314)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- technology use, sleep disorders, bidirectional effects, bright light exposure, arousal, emotion regulation, sleep onset, moderators
- MeSH terms
- Arousal, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review