Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Routine cholecystectomy is not mandatory during morbid obesity surgery

Ellner, Scott J., Myers, Tamara T., Piorkowski, James R., Mavanur, Arun A., Barba, Carlos A.·2007·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Controversy exists concerning the utility of routine cholecystectomy during bariatric surgery. We report our series of bariatric surgical procedures at our institution without concurrent cholecystectomy. Methods From October 2003 to August 2005, 621 morbidly obese patients underwent a weight loss operation. Preoperatively, each patient had undergone abdominal ultrasound (AUS) to evaluate for abnormal gallbladder findings. Patients with previous cholecystectomy were excluded. Symptomatic patients with AUS findings consistent with gallbladder disease underwent concomitant cholecystectomy and bariatric surgery. Asymptomatic patients, despite AUS findings, did not undergo cholecystectomy with their bariatric operation. A comparison between the preoperative AUS-positive and AUS-negative, asymptomatic patients after bariatric surgery was performed. Results Of the 621 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, 170 (27%) had undergone previous cholecystectomy and were excluded. Of the remaining 451 patients, 17 with positive AUS findings and symptoms underwent cholecystectomy during bariatric surgery. The range of follow-up was 4-25 months. Of the 451 patients, 324 were asymptomatic and had negative AUS findings and 102 were asymptomatic and had positive AUS findings for gallbladder abnormalities. Postoperatively, 29 asymptomatic/AUS-negative patients (9%) developed symptoms and had positive AUS findings. Nine asymptomatic patients with AUS positive findings (9%) developed…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2006.11.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Gustafsson, 2005, Changes in gallbladder bite composition and crystal detection time in morbidly obese subjects after bariatric surgery, Hepatology, 41, 1322, 10.1002/hep.20686 · DOI
  2. Everhart, 1993, Contribution of obesity and weight loss to gallstone disease, Ann Intern Med, 119, 1029, 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00010 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fobi, 2002, Prophylactic cholecystectomy with gastric bypass operation: incidence of gallbladder disease, Obes Surg, 12, 350, 10.1381/096089202321088138 · DOI
  4. Liem, 2004, Prophylactic cholecystectomy with open gastric bypass operation, Obes Surg, 14, 763, 10.1381/0960892041590746 · DOI
  5. Zilberstein, 2004, Simultaneous gastric banding and cholecystectomy in the treatment of morbid obesity: is it feasible?, Obes Surg, 14, 1331, 10.1381/0960892042583941 · DOI
  6. Hamad, 2003, Elective cholecystectomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y. gastric bypass: is it worth the wait?, Obes Surg, 13, 76, 10.1381/096089203321136638 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Villegas, 2004, Is routine cholecystectomy required during laparoscopic gastric bypass?, Obes Surg, 14, 206, 10.1381/096089204322857573 · DOI
  8. Swartz, 2005, Elective cholecystectomy after Roux-en-Y. gastric bypass: why should asymptomatic gallstones be treated differently in morbidly obese patients?, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 1, 555, 10.1016/j.soard.2005.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Caruana, 2005, Incidence of symptomatic gallstones after gastric bypass: is prophylactic treatment really necessary?, Surg Obes Relat Dis, 1, 564, 10.1016/j.soard.2005.08.004 · DOI
  10. O’Brien, 2003, A rational approach to cholelithiasis in bariatric surgery, Arch Surg, 138, 908, 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.908 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fielding, 2005, Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, Surg Clin North Am, 85, 129, 10.1016/j.suc.2004.10.004 · DOI
  12. Wittgrove, 1996, Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y.: experience of 27 cases, with 3–18 months follow-up, Obes Surg, 6, 54, 10.1381/096089296765557277 · DOI
  13. Mason, 1969, Gastric bypass, Ann Surg, 170, 329, 10.1097/00000658-196909010-00003 · DOI
  14. Gonzalez, 2005, Operative technique for converting a failed vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y. gastric bypass, J Am Coll Surg, 201, 366, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.022 · DOI
  15. Mason, 2002, Gallbladder management in obesity surgery, Obes Surg, 12, 222, 10.1381/096089202762552395 · DOI
  16. Iglaezias, 2003, Impact of rapid weight reduction on risk of cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery, Obes Surg, 13, 625, 10.1381/096089203322190862 · DOI
  17. Stampfer, 1992, Risk of symptomatic gallstones in women with severe obesity, Am J Clin Nutr, 55, 652, 10.1093/ajcn/55.3.652 · DOI
  18. Sugerman, 1995, A multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial of prophylactic ursodiol for the prevention of gallstone formation following gastric-bypass-induced rapid weight loss, Am J Surg, 169, 91, 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80115-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Scott, 2003, Intraoperative ultrasound and prophylactic ursodiol for gallstone prevention following laparoscopic gastric bypass, Surg Endosc, 17, 1796, 10.1007/s00464-002-8930-7 · DOI
  20. McSherry, 1985, The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, Ann Surg, 202, 59, 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00009 · DOI
  21. Ferzli, 2004, Trocar placement for laparoscopic abdominal procedures: a simple standardized method, J Am Coll Surg, 198, 163, 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ellner, S. J., Myers, T. T., Piorkowski, J. R., Mavanur, A. A., & Barba, C. A.
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
456-460
ISSN
1550-7289
Cited by
34
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review