The Relationship Among Food Addiction, Negative Mood, and Eating-Disordered Behaviors in Patients Seeking to Have Bariatric Surgery
Abstract
Background Food addiction (FA) may be related to poor weight loss outcomes; however, the literature on food addiction in bariatric surgery-seeking populations is limited.Objectives The aim of the present study was to identify the prevalence of FA in a bariatric surgery-seeking population and its association with mood, problematic eating behaviors, and substance use. The relationship between prebariatric surgery food addiction screening and postsurgical outcomes was assessed.Setting Academic medical center.Methods Adult outpatients (n = 923) seeking bariatric surgery underwent psychological evaluation between January 2012 and May 2014. Patients were administered the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) to assess FA. Of the original sample, 195 patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Patients returned for medical follow-up at 6 (n = 169) and 12 (n = 113) months postsurgery; 26 (13%) patients at 6 months and 82 (42%) patients at 12 months were lost to follow-up or had not reached 1 year postsurgery.Results Fourteen percent of patients met FA criteria. Patients positive for FA were more likely to endorse greater levels of depression, anxiety, binge eating episodes, nighttime eating syndrome, and low eating self-efficacy. No relationship was observed between FA and current substance use. FA did not predict postoperative outcomes including weight loss, rehospitalization, or attendance at follow-up medical appointments.Conclusions FA is related to psychological distress and eating disordered behaviors among bariatric patients. However, FA was not predictive of short-term (6-12 mo) bariatric surgery outcomes. Future research should determine how FA affects long-term postoperative outcomes and mood stability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Problematic eating behaviors before surgery are common but are not reliable predictors of suboptimal weight loss and are rarely a contraindication for undergoing bariatric surgery.
“Problematic eating behaviors before surgery—although common—are not reliable predictors of suboptimal weight loss and are rarely a contraindication for undergoing bariatric surgery (5, 6).”
From Behavioral Interventions to Attenuate Driven Overeating and Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Koball, A. M., Clark, M. M., Collazo-Clavell, M., Kellogg, T., Ames, G., Ebbert, J., & Grothe, K. B.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grothe, Karen B.
- Venue
- Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-170
- ISSN
- 1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035845381
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- food addiction, bariatric surgery
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Aged, Depression, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Prevalence, Behavior, Addictive, Bariatric Surgery, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review