Cultural scripts for a good death in Japan and the United States: similarities and differences.
Abstract
Japan and the United States are both post-industrial societies, characterised by distinct trajectories of dying. Both contain multiple "cultural scripts" of the good death. Seale (Constructing Death: the Sociology of Dying and Bereavement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998) has identified at least four "cultural scripts", or ways to die well, that are found in contemporary anglophone countries: modern medicine, revivalism, an anti-revivalist script and a religious script. Although these scripts can also be found in Japan, different historical experiences and religious traditions provide a context in which their content and interpretation sometimes differ from those of the anglophone countries. To understand ordinary people's ideas about dying well and dying poorly, we must recognise not only that post-industrial society offers multiple scripts and varying interpretive frameworks, but also that people actively select from among them in making decisions and explaining their views. Moreover, ideas and metaphors may be based on multiple scripts simultaneously or may offer different interpretations for different social contexts. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in both countries, this paper explores the metaphors that ordinary patients and caregivers draw upon as they use, modify, combine or ignore these cultural scripts of dying. Ideas about choice, time, place and personhood, elements of a good death that were derived inductively from interviews, are described. These Japanese and American data suggest somewhat different concerns and assumptions about human life and the relation of the person to the wider social world, but indicate similar concerns about the process of medicalised dying and the creation of meaning for those involved. While cultural differences do exist, they cannot be explained by reference to 'an American' and 'a Japanese' way to die. Rather, the process of creating and maintaining cultural scripts requires the active participation of ordinary people as they in turn respond to the constraints of post-industrial technology, institutions, demographics and notions of self.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Societies and/or subgroups carry different beliefs about suicide across time and space.
“Research clearly demonstrates that societies and/or subgroups within those societies carry different beliefs about suicide across time and space (Barbagli, 2015) and death more generally (Long, 2004).”
From The Social Roots of Suicide: Theorizing How the External Social World Matters to Suicide and Suicide Prevention (2021) · cites this paper as Long, 2004
Cites
An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues
Harvey, P. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800801 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mueller, A. S., Abrutyn, S., Pescosolido, B., & Diefendorf, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621569 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
- Authors
- Long, S. O.
- Affiliations
- John Carroll University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Long, Susan Orpett
- ORCID
- Long, Susan Orpett
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 913-928
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002255606
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- good death, cultural scripts, death metaphors, personhood, meaning-making, Japan-US comparison, post-industrial society
- MeSH terms
- Anthropology, Cultural, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Death, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Decision Making, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Japan, Palliative Care, Religion and Psychology, Social Environment, Sociology, Medical, Thanatology, Midwestern United States, Hospice Care, Personhood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review