Cited by 149Death, Funerary Practices, and MourningPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

Cultural scripts for a good death in Japan and the United States: similarities and differences.

Long, Susan Orpett·2004·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Japan and the United States are both post-industrial societies, characterised by distinct trajectories of dying. Both contain multiple "cultural scripts" of the good death. Seale (Constructing Death: the Sociology of Dying and Bereavement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998) has identified at least four "cultural scripts", or ways to die well, that are found in contemporary anglophone countries: modern medicine, revivalism, an anti-revivalist script and a religious script. Although these scripts can also be found in Japan, different historical experiences and religious traditions provide a context in which their content and interpretation sometimes differ from those of the anglophone countries. To understand ordinary people's ideas about dying well and dying poorly, we must recognise not only that post-industrial society offers multiple scripts and varying interpretive frameworks, but also that people actively select from among them in making decisions and explaining their views. Moreover, ideas and metaphors may be based on multiple scripts simultaneously or may offer different interpretations for different social contexts. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in both countries, this paper explores the metaphors that ordinary patients and caregivers draw upon as they use, modify, combine or ignore these cultural scripts of dying. Ideas about choice, time, place and personhood, elements of a good death that were derived inductively from interviews, are described. These Japanese and American data suggest somewhat different concerns and assumptions about human life and the relation of the person to the wider social world, but indicate similar concerns about the process of medicalised dying and the creation of meaning for those involved. While cultural differences do exist, they cannot be explained by reference to 'an American' and 'a Japanese' way to die. Rather, the process of creating and maintaining cultural scripts requires the active participation of ordinary people as they in turn respond to the constraints of post-industrial technology, institutions, demographics and notions of self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.037

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Long, S. O.
Affiliations
John Carroll University (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Susan Orpett
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
913-928
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002255606
Cited by
149
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
good death, cultural scripts, death metaphors, personhood, meaning-making, Japan-US comparison, post-industrial society
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Death, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Decision Making, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Japan, Palliative Care, Religion and Psychology, Social Environment, Sociology, Medical, Thanatology, Midwestern United States, Hospice Care, Personhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review