Chronic disease and mental disorder
Abstract
The aim of this study was to achieve a better understanding of the relationship between chronic medical illness and mental distress. Therefore, the association between chronic medical illness and mental distress was analysed, taking into account the modifying effects of generic disease characteristics (concerning course, control and possible stressful consequences), physical quality of life indicators and social and relationship problems. Panel data from the Dutch national Panel of Patients with a Chronic Disease (PPCZ) were used. Data from 1788 chronically medical ill patients (nine disease categories) concerning their mental and physical health have been used in a cross-sectional, multivariate analysis. Somatic disease, generic disease characteristics and physical quality of life were assessed by medical doctors. Mental distress and social/ relationship problems were assessed by questionnaire (respectively, GHQ-12 and Biopro). Members of the panel had more mental distress than a random community sample. However, there were no differences between specific somatic diseases. Relationship, job-related and financial problems increased the probability of mental disorder considerably. Relationship problems may be considered a generic characteristic of chronically ill patients, causing an increased risk of mental disorder. Poor physical health condition contributed to a higher probability of mental disorder as well. General practitioners, home care providers and medical specialists…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Having a chronic illness is in itself a risk factor for developing mood and anxiety disorders.
“Having a chronic illness is in itself a risk factor for developing mood and anxiety disorders, perhaps because it can restrict lifestyle and function (National Institute of Mental Health 2021;Naylor et al. 2012;Verhaak et al. 2005), low-grade inflammation (Berk et al. 2013) and potentially other factors that we focus on in our study, namely illness-related stigma and shame.”
From Illness Stigma and Shame in People With Chronic Illnesses vs. SARS‐CoV‐2 Survivors: Associations With Psychological Distress Through Psychological Flexibility and Self‐Compassion. (2024) · cites this paper as Verhaak et al. 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Verhaak, P. F. M., Heijmans, M. J. W. M., Peters, L., & Rijken, M.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Verhaak, Peter F.M.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 789-797
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068677578
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- chronic disease, psychological distress, mental illness, physical quality of life, relationship problems, financial problems, health perception, disease characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Age Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review