Cited by 164Mental Health Treatment and AccessChronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth disparities and outcomes

Chronic disease and mental disorder

Verhaak, Peter F.M., Heijmans, Monique J.W.M., Peters, Loe, Rijken, Mieke·2005·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this study was to achieve a better understanding of the relationship between chronic medical illness and mental distress. Therefore, the association between chronic medical illness and mental distress was analysed, taking into account the modifying effects of generic disease characteristics (concerning course, control and possible stressful consequences), physical quality of life indicators and social and relationship problems. Panel data from the Dutch national Panel of Patients with a Chronic Disease (PPCZ) were used. Data from 1788 chronically medical ill patients (nine disease categories) concerning their mental and physical health have been used in a cross-sectional, multivariate analysis. Somatic disease, generic disease characteristics and physical quality of life were assessed by medical doctors. Mental distress and social/ relationship problems were assessed by questionnaire (respectively, GHQ-12 and Biopro). Members of the panel had more mental distress than a random community sample. However, there were no differences between specific somatic diseases. Relationship, job-related and financial problems increased the probability of mental disorder considerably. Relationship problems may be considered a generic characteristic of chronically ill patients, causing an increased risk of mental disorder. Poor physical health condition contributed to a higher probability of mental disorder as well. General practitioners, home care providers and medical specialists…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 164

Authors
Verhaak, P. F. M., Heijmans, M. J. W. M., Peters, L., & Rijken, M.
Affiliations
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Verhaak, Peter F.M.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
789-797
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068677578
Cited by
164
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
chronic disease, psychological distress, mental illness, physical quality of life, relationship problems, financial problems, health perception, disease characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review