Cited by 170Aging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesAging and Gerontology Research

Digging deep: Using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people

Milligan, Christine, Bingley, Amanda, Gatrell, Anthony·2005·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

To date, solicited diaries have been relatively neglected as a social science research method. This is particularly true within the field of health research. Yet, these narrative approaches can provide invaluable insights into the health behaviours of individuals and how these are played out across time and space. To illustrate this, we draw on recent research in the north west of England that investigated the potential benefits of communal gardening as opposed to other social activities in maintaining the health and emotional well-being of older people. As part of a wider study using largely qualitative techniques, our analysis revealed that, contrary to the findings of earlier studies, diaries can be used effectively over relatively long periods of time and are equally effective in exploring health issues amongst both older men and women. With the benefit of good researcher support, we argue that diary techniques can offer some unique insights into the ongoing health routines and coping strategies of older people and can prove invaluable in uncovering those, often hidden, aspects of their daily lives and routines that impact on their health histories. Through the gathering of chronologically organised data about daily activities, diaries can act as both a record and reflection of the health experiences, activities and life-worlds inhabited by older people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceived health, social functioning, and happiness can vary from day to day, particularly among older adults.

    “Although perceived health, social functioning, and happiness may vary from day to day – particularly among older adults (Milligan, Bingley, & Gatrell, 2005) – prior research in this area has focused almost exclusively on relatively stable individual differences in these domains and on the longer-term processes by which they are linked.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 170

Authors
Milligan, C., Bingley, A., & Gatrell, A.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
61
Issue
9
Pages
1882-1892
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086341910
Cited by
170
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
diary method, older adults, health and well-being, emotional well-being, social activity, health behavior, coping strategies, daily routine, lifeworld, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Chronology as Topic, England, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Leisure Activities, Male, Medical Records, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Writing, Narration, Qualitative Research, Gardening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review