Digging deep: Using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people
Abstract
To date, solicited diaries have been relatively neglected as a social science research method. This is particularly true within the field of health research. Yet, these narrative approaches can provide invaluable insights into the health behaviours of individuals and how these are played out across time and space. To illustrate this, we draw on recent research in the north west of England that investigated the potential benefits of communal gardening as opposed to other social activities in maintaining the health and emotional well-being of older people. As part of a wider study using largely qualitative techniques, our analysis revealed that, contrary to the findings of earlier studies, diaries can be used effectively over relatively long periods of time and are equally effective in exploring health issues amongst both older men and women. With the benefit of good researcher support, we argue that diary techniques can offer some unique insights into the ongoing health routines and coping strategies of older people and can prove invaluable in uncovering those, often hidden, aspects of their daily lives and routines that impact on their health histories. Through the gathering of chronologically organised data about daily activities, diaries can act as both a record and reflection of the health experiences, activities and life-worlds inhabited by older people.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceived health, social functioning, and happiness can vary from day to day, particularly among older adults.
“Although perceived health, social functioning, and happiness may vary from day to day – particularly among older adults (Milligan, Bingley, & Gatrell, 2005) – prior research in this area has focused almost exclusively on relatively stable individual differences in these domains and on the longer-term processes by which they are linked.”
From What's love got to do with it? Social functioning, perceived health, and daily happiness in married octogenarians (2010) · cites this paper as Milligan, Bingley, & Gatrell, 2005
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 170
- Authors
- Milligan, C., Bingley, A., & Gatrell, A.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1882-1892
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086341910
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- diary method, older adults, health and well-being, emotional well-being, social activity, health behavior, coping strategies, daily routine, lifeworld, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Chronology as Topic, England, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Leisure Activities, Male, Medical Records, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Writing, Narration, Qualitative Research, Gardening
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review