Estimating clandestine abortion with the confidants method—results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Open accessAbstract
Data on abortion in sub-Saharan Africa are rare and non-representative. This study presents a new method to collect quantitative data on clandestine abortion, the confidants method, applied in 2001 in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Preliminary qualitative work showed that individuals are aware of their close friends' induced abortions: women usually talk to their peers about the unintended pregnancy and ask them for help in locating illegal abortion providers. In a survey of 963 women of reproductive age representative of the city of Ouagadougou, we asked respondents to list their close relations, and, for each of them, and for each of the 5 years preceding the survey, whether they had an induced abortion. According to these data, there are 40 induced abortions per 1000 women aged 15-49 in Ouagadougou annually, and 60 per 1000 women aged 15-19. Adverse health consequences followed 60% of the reported induced abortions, and 14% of them received treatment in a hospital. Extrapolating these results to the entire city, we estimate that its hospitals treat about 1000 cases of abortion complications a year. Hospital data indicate that these centers admitted 984 induced abortions (adding all "certainly", "probably" and "possibly" induced abortions in the WHO protocol) in 2001; the age distribution of patients admitted for induced abortion also corresponds to the confidants method's projections ("certainly" induced abortions only). At least two biases could affect the abortion rates esti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Burkina Faso, 61% of all abortions were induced by a health professional.
“A similar picture has been found in Burkina Faso, where 61% of all abortions were induced by a health professional (14).”
From Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview (2011) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unsafe abortion and postabortion care - an overview
RASCH, V. (2011) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01165.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rossier, C., Guiella, G., Ouédraogo, A., & Thiéba, B.
- Affiliations
- Institut national d'études démographiques (FR)
- Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo (BF)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo (BF)
- Corresponding author
- Rossier, Clémentine
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 254-266
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091353503
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Keywords
- illegal abortion, abortion, abortion complications, hospitalization, women of reproductive age, adolescent abortion, peer networks, survey bias, Ouagadougou
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Illegal, Abortion, Criminal, Adolescent, Adult, Burkina Faso, Data Collection, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitalization, Humans, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Unwanted, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, Social Support, Bias, Incidence, Age Distribution, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review