The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The contribution of maternal working conditions to socio-economic inequalities in birth outcome
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Difference-of-coefficients between models was the most common mediation analysis approach”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Six separate individual level measures were used; maternal education was the most frequent (n = 7) [33, 34, 46, 47, 49–51], followed by occupation (each n = 3) [43, 48, 52], two used income [35, 45], two used different composite measures [40, 54], and one used perceived lack of time and money [41].”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“nine explained measurement of preterm birth inadequately [34, 36, 38, 39, 44, 48, 51, 52, 54].”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“The temporal nature of measurement of exposure and outcome was unclear in eight studies[33, 34, 36, 37, 48, 52–54].”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Proportion eliminated was: 46% for working conditions, 44% for job control, 22% for physical demands, and 5% for job hazards.”
From Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
2 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Alfredsson, 1982, Myocardial infarction risk and psychosocial work environment: an analysis of the male Swedish working force, Social Science & Medicine, 16, 463, 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90054-5 · DOI
- Andersson, 1981, Att beskriva den sociala strukturen. Utvärdering av 1974 års förslag till socio-ekonomisk indelning, Statistisk Tidskrift, 1981, 113
- Arntzen, 2004, Social determinants for infant mortality in the Nordic countries, 1980–2001, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32, 381, 10.1080/14034940410029450 · DOI
- Blane, 1993, Social selection: what does it contribute to social-class differences in health, Sociology of Health & Illness, 15, 2, 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343777 · DOI
- Bohlin, 1986, Pace variation and control of work pace as related to cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and subjective responses, Biological Psychology, 23, 247, 10.1016/0301-0511(86)90003-7 · DOI
- Borg, 2000, Social class and self-rated health: can the gradient be explained by differences in life style or work environment?, Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1019, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00011-3 · DOI
- Bosma, 1997, Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study, BMJ, 314, 558, 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.558 · DOI
- Dahlberg, 2004, Do work technique and musculoskeletal symptoms differ between men and women performing the same type of work tasks?, Applied Ergonomics, 35, 521, 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.008 · DOI
- Erikson, 1984, Social class of men, women and families, Sociology, 18, 500, 10.1177/0038038584018004003 · DOI
- Farrow, 1998, Birthweight of term infants and maternal occupation in a prospective cohort of pregnant women. The ALSPAC Study Team, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55, 18, 10.1136/oem.55.1.18 · DOI
- Gennaro, 2003, Psychological and physiological stress: impact on preterm birth, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 32, 668, 10.1177/0884217503257484 · DOI
- Gisselmann, 2005, Education, infant mortality, and low birth weight in Sweden 1973–1990: emergence of the low birth weight paradox, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 33, 65, 10.1080/14034940410028352 · DOI
- Gisselmann, 2006, The influence of maternal childhood and adulthood social class on the health of the infant, Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1023, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.015 · DOI
- Hobel, 2003, Role of psychosocial and nutritional stress on poor pregnancy outcome, The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 1709S, 10.1093/jn/133.5.1709S · DOI
- Hogue, 2001, Stress and preterm delivery: a conceptual framework, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 15, S30, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00006.x · DOI
- Johansson, 1991, Smoking and sedentary behavior as related to work organization, Social Science & Medicine, 32, 837, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90310-9 · DOI
- Johnson, 1993, Measuring work organization exposure over the life course with a job-exposure matrix, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 19, 21, 10.5271/sjweh.1508 · DOI
- Kramer, 2001, Socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: causal pathways and mechanisms, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 15, 104, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00012.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kramer, 2000, Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly?, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 14, 194, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x · DOI
- Lundberg, 1991, Causal explanations for class inequality in health: an empirical analysis, Social Science & Medicine, 32, 385, 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90339-E · DOI
- Macleod, 2001, Are the effects of psychosocial exposures attributable to confounding? Evidence from a prospective observational study on psychological stress and mortality, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 878, 10.1136/jech.55.12.878 · DOI
- Montanari, 2001, Choosing time and time for work: cross-national variation in paid work among married women, Sociologisk Forskning, 38, 6, 10.37062/sf.38.19446 · DOI
- Morello-Frosch, 2006, The environmental “riskscape” and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities, Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 1150, 10.1289/ehp.8930 · DOI
- Mozurkewich, 2000, Working conditions and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95, 623, 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00598-0 · DOI
- Nordström, 1996, Effects on birthweights of maternal education, socio-economic status, and work-related characteristics, Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 24, 55, 10.1177/140349489602400109 · DOI
- Power, 1998, Inequalities in self-rated health: explanations from different stages of life, The Lancet, 351, 1009, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11082-0 · DOI
- Rahkonen, 2006, Job control, job demands, or social class? The impact of working conditions on the relation between social class and health, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 50, 10.1136/jech.2005.035758 · DOI
- Reime, 2006, The role of mediating factors in the association between social deprivation and low birth weight in Germany, Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1731, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.017 · DOI · Paper page
- Rich-Edwards, 2005, Psychosocial stress and neuroendocrine mechanisms in preterm delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192, S30, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.072 · DOI
- Rylander, 2002, Reproductive outcome among female hairdressers, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 517, 10.1136/oem.59.8.517 · DOI
- Sanjose, 1991, Low birthweight and preterm delivery, Scotland, 1981–1984: effect of parents' occupation, The Lancet, 338, 428, 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91045-V · DOI
- Schrijvers, 1998, Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions, International Journal of Epidemiology, 27, 1011, 10.1093/ije/27.6.1011 · DOI
- Seidler, 1999, Maternal occupational exposure to chemical substances and the risk of infants small-for-gestational-age, American Journal of Indian Medicine, 36, 213, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<213::AID-AJIM30>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
- Silbergeld, 2005, Environmental exposures, toxicologic mechanisms, and adverse pregnancy outcomes, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192, S11, 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.117 · DOI
- Steptoe, 1997, Perceptions of control over work: psychophysiological responses to self-paced and externally-paced tasks in an adult population sample, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 211, 10.1016/S0167-8760(96)00747-7 · DOI
- Theorell, 2005, On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health—are they reliable?, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78, 517, 10.1007/s00420-005-0618-6 · DOI
- Volinn, 2001, Point of view, Spine, 26, 1902, 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00017 · DOI
- Wergeland, 1998, Strenuous working conditions and birthweight, Norway 1989, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 77, 263, 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.770302.x · DOI
Cited by
Mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in preterm birth: a systematic review
McHale, P., Maudsley, G., Pennington, A., Schlüter, D. K., Barr, B., Paranjothy, S., & Taylor-Robinson, D. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13438-9 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Gisselmann, M. D., & Hemström, Ö.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1297-1309
- ISSN
- 0277-9536
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The contribution of maternal working conditions to socio-economic inequalities in birth outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.036
- The paper
- Gisselmann, M. D., & Hemström, Ö. (2008). The contribution of maternal working conditions to socio-economic inequalities in birth outcome. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.