Cited by 331Health disparities and outcomesUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries?

Flowerdew, Robin, Manley, David J., Sabel, Clive E.·2008·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

There has been considerable discussion in health geography and related areas of neighbourhood effects on health: the idea that people's health in one geographical area may be influenced not only by the composition of that area's population, but also by the area's geographical context. Hence, the healthiness or otherwise of the neighbourhood may have an important effect on local people's health. Although neighbourhoods and their boundaries are sometimes obvious to local residents, it is more common to find considerable disagreement on the size and contents of a neighbourhood. In this paper, we use British census Enumeration Districts as building blocks to construct alternative zonal systems, and experiment to see if neighbourhoods defined in different ways have similar implications for health. The well known modifiable areal unit problem shows that analytical conclusions may differ substantially according to how data are aggregated. Boundaries can be drawn to maximize equality of size, compactness of shape, homogeneity in social composition, accordance with 'natural' boundaries, and probably many other factors; which of these criteria are more effective in defining zones relevant to health? One conclusion is that the effect of neighbourhood conditions should be looked at using several different ways to define neighbourhoods, and that the size and composition of these neighbourhoods may be different in different parts of a study area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Charlton, 1994, Long-term Illness: results from the 1991 Census, Population Trends, 75, 18
  2. Clark, A. J. (2004). Wish you were here? Experiences of moving through stigmatised neighbourhoods in urban Scotland. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews.
  3. Cockings, 2005, Zone design for environmental and health studies using pre-aggregated data, Social Science and Medicine, 60, 2729, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.005 · DOI
  4. Flowerdew, 2007, Constructing data zones for Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31, 76, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.07.008 · DOI
  5. Fotheringham, 1999, Guest editorial: local modelling, Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 3, 5
  6. Fotheringham, 1991, The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis, Environment and Planning A, 23, 1025, 10.1068/a231025 · DOI
  7. Gehlke, 1934, Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation in census tract material, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 29, 169
  8. Heasman, 1986, Childhood leukaemia in northern Scotland, Lancet, 1986, 266, 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90794-4 · DOI
  9. Macintyre, 1993, Area, class and health: should we be focusing on places or people?, Journal of Social Policy, 22, 213, 10.1017/S0047279400019310 · DOI
  10. Manley, 2006, Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 143, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.08.005 · DOI
  11. Manley, D. J. (2006). The modifiable areal unit phenomenon: an investigation into the scale effect using UK census data. Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews.
  12. Manley, D., Steel, D., & Flowerdew, R. (2007). Why we should still worry about the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. British Society of Population Studies, Annual Conference, St Andrews, 11–13 September 2007.
  13. Martin, 2001, The application of zone design methodology to the 2001 UK census, Environment and Planning A, 33, 1949, 10.1068/a3497 · DOI
  14. McCulloch, 2001, Ward-level deprivation and individual social and economic outcomes in the British Household Panel Study, Environment and Planning A, 33, 667, 10.1068/a33205 · DOI
  15. Openshaw, 1995, Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography, Environment and Planning A, 27, 425, 10.1068/a270425 · DOI
  16. Pickett, 2001, Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 111, 10.1136/jech.55.2.111 · DOI
  17. Rezaeian, 2006, Ecological association between suicide rates and indices of deprivation in the north west region of England: the importance of the size of the administrative unit, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 956, 10.1136/jech.2005.043109 · DOI
  18. Sloggett, 1998, Deprivation indicators as predictors of life events 1981–1992 based on the UK ONS longitudinal study, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 228, 10.1136/jech.52.4.228 · DOI
  19. Tranmer, 1998, Using census data to investigate the causes of the ecological fallacy, Environment and Planning A, 30, 817, 10.1068/a300817 · DOI
  20. Wong, P. (2006). Representing suburbs as vague spatial entities: a Web-based PPGIS approach. Unpublished MSc thesis, Department of Geography, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–278 of 278

Metadata

Authors
Flowerdew, R., Manley, D. J., & Sabel, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Flowerdew, Robin
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
1241-1255
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967823327
Cited by
331
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Joint Information Systems Committee
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
neighbourhood boundaries, modifiable areal unit problem, spatial aggregation, neighborhood composition, geographic context, health disparities
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Geography, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Humans, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Small-Area Analysis, Censuses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review