CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Smoking Behavior and CessationReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion, Society, and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adult smokers' perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: A comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims

Open access
Yong, Hua-Hie, Hamann, Stephen L., Borland, Ron, Fong, Geoffrey T., Omar, Maizurah·2009·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042PMC PMC2775092
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In recent years, attempts have been made to incorporate religion into tobacco control efforts, especially in countries like Malaysia and Thailand where religion is central to the lives of people. This paper is a prospective examination of the perceived relevance and role of religion and religious authorities in influencing smoking behaviour among Muslims in Malaysia and Buddhists in Thailand. Data were collected from 1482 Muslim Malaysian and 1971 Buddhist Thai adult smokers who completed wave 1 (early 2005) of the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey (ITC-SEA). Respondents were asked about the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking at Wave 1 and among those recontacted, quitting activity at Wave 2. Results revealed that over 90% of both religious groups reported that their religion guides their day-to-day behaviour at least sometimes, but Malaysian Muslims were more likely to report that this was always the case. The majority (79% Muslims and 88% Buddhists) of both groups believed that their religion discourages smoking. About 61% of the Muslims and 58% of the Buddhists reported that their religious leaders had encouraged them to quit before and a minority (30% and 26%, respectively) said they would be an influential source to motivate them to quit. Logistic regression models suggest that these religious factors had a clear independent association with making quitting attempts in both countries and this translated to success for Malaysian Muslims but not for the Thai Buddhists. Taken together, results from this study indicate that religion and religious authorities are both relevant and important drivers of quitting, but whether this is always enough to guarantee success is less clear. Religion can be a culturally relevant vehicle to complement other tobacco control efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yong, H.-H., Hamann, S. L., Borland, R., Fong, G. T., & Omar, M.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
  • Thai Health Promotion Foundation (TH)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Yong, Hua-Hie
ORCID
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
69
Issue
7
Pages
1025-1031
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.042
PMC
PMC2775092
OpenAlex
W1983140592
Cited by
120
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50CA111236, R01CA100362)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
Keywords
religious leadership, smoking cessation, tobacco control, religiosity, Malaysia, Thailand
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Buddhism, Clergy, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Islam, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Religion, Role, Socioeconomic Factors, Thailand, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review