“These are not good things for other people to know”: How rural Tanzanian women’s experiences of pregnancy loss and early neonatal death may impact survey data quality
Abstract
Little research in low-income countries has compared the social and cultural ramifications of loss in childbearing, yet the social experience of pregnancy loss and early neonatal death may affect demographers' ability to measure their incidence. Ninety-five qualitative reproductive narratives were collected from 50 women in rural southern Tanzania who had recently suffered infertility, miscarriage, stillbirth or early neonatal death. An additional 31 interviews with new mothers and female elders were used to assess childbearing norms and social consequences of loss in childbearing. We found that like pregnancy, stillbirth and early neonatal death are hidden because they heighten women's vulnerability to social and physical harm, and women's discourse and behaviors are under strong social control. To protect themselves from sorcery, spiritual interference, and gossip--as well as stigma should a spontaneous loss be viewed as an induced abortion--women conceal pregnancies and are advised not to mourn or grieve for "immature" (late-term) losses. Twelve of 30 respondents with pregnancy losses had been accused of inducing an abortion; 3 of these had been subsequently divorced. Incommensurability between Western biomedical and local categories of reproductive loss also complicates measurement of losses. Similar gender inequalities and understandings of pregnancy and reproductive loss in other low-resource settings likely result in underreporting of these losses elsewhere. Cultural,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cross-cultural studies with women highlight culturally-specific understandings and practices relating to loss of a baby that can impact grief.
“However, while the impact of cultural diversity is yet to be explored in men, cross-cultural studies with women highlight a range of culturally-specific understandings and practices relating to the loss of a baby that can impact upon grief [105–109].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [106]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Haws, R. A., Mashasi, I., Mrisho, M., Schellenberg, J. A., Darmstadt, G. L., & Winch, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Ifakara Health Institute (TZ)
- Corresponding author
- Haws, Rachel A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1764-1772
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090248378
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- J. William Fulbright Foundation Fellowship
- Johns Hopkins
- Wright and Bodian Scholarships
- American Association of University Women American Fellowship
- P.E.O. International Scholar Award
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- miscarriage, stillbirth, early neonatal death, survey data quality, concealment of pregnancy, abortion stigma, sorcery beliefs, grief and mourning, gender inequality
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Female, Health Surveys, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Infertility, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Poverty Areas, Pregnancy, Research Design, Rural Health, Tanzania, Women, Qualitative Research, Stillbirth, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review