Cited by 123Women's cancer prevention and managementGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCultural Competency in Health Care

Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: Changing interventions, not cultures

Erwin, Deborah O., Treviño, Michelle, Saad-Harfouche, Frances G., Rodriguez, Elisa M., Gage, Elizabeth, Jandorf, Lina·2010·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

While there is a growing interest in the development of cancer control intervention initiatives, there continues to be a need to understand how the nuances of different Latino cultures translate to opportunities and barriers for access to cancer screening and care. The diversity by country of origin for Latinas in the United States is often overlooked in cancer control initiatives, and the application of qualitative research can expose processes of inequity and cultural variation to improve these initiatives. This paper presents an interpretation of diverse Latina immigrants' perceptions, experiences and knowledge about breast and cervical cancer screening and demonstrates the use of the PEN-3 model to analyze these data to develop an effective outreach intervention. We conducted 13 focus groups consisting of a total of 112 Latinas in New York City (nine groups) and rural and urban sites in Arkansas (four groups) in 2003 through 2004. Through nonprobability theoretical sampling, we included women from Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic and Mexico in New York and recent Mexican immigrants in Arkansas. Findings demonstrated that country of origin and current geographic residency in the U.S. were significant determinants of women's perspectives on community-based religious organizations, knowledge of anatomy, experiences with the medical system, and access to services which are essential factors to consider in developing effective cancer control interventions. Although breast a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 123

Authors
Erwin, D. O., Treviño, M., Saad-Harfouche, F. G., Rodriguez, E. M., Gage, E., & Jandorf, L.
Affiliations
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Erwin, Deborah O.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
71
Issue
4
Pages
693-701
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988038395
Cited by
123
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
cancer control interventions, Hispanic women, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, PEN-3 model, country of origin, immigrant women, health disparities, access to cancer care, gender relations, Puerto Rican women, Dominican women, Mexican immigrant women
MeSH terms
Adult, Arkansas, Breast Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Culture, Dominican Republic, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mexico, Middle Aged, New York City, Puerto Rico, Focus Groups, Cultural Diversity, Qualitative Research, Emigrants and Immigrants, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review