Cited by 76Employment and Welfare StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessYouth Education and Societal Dynamics

Childhood psychological distress and youth unemployment: Evidence from two British cohort studies

Open access
Egan, Mark, Daly, Michael, Delaney, Liam·2015·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The effect of childhood mental health on later unemployment has not yet been established. In this article we assess whether childhood psychological distress places young people at high risk of subsequent unemployment and whether the presence of economic recession strengthens this relationship. This study was based on 19,217 individuals drawn from two nationally-representative British prospective cohort studies; the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) and the National Child Development Study (NCDS). Both cohorts contain rich contemporaneous information detailing the participants' early life socioeconomic background, household characteristics, and physical health. In adjusted analyses in the LSYPE sample (N = 10,232) those who reported high levels of distress at age 14 were 2 percentage points more likely than those with low distress to be unemployed between ages 16 and 21. In adjusted analyses of the NCDS sample (N = 8985) children rated as having high distress levels by their teachers at age 7 and 11 were 3 percentage points more likely than those with low distress to be unemployed between ages 16 and 23. Our examination of the 1980 UK recession in the NCDS cohort found the difference in average unemployment level between those with high versus low distress rose from 2.6 pct points in the pre-recession period to 3.9 points in the post-recession period. These findings point to a previously neglected contribution of childhood mental health to youth unemployment, which may be particularly pronounced during times of economic recession. Our findings also suggest a further economic benefit to enhancing the provision of mental health services early in life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 76

Authors
Egan, M., Daly, M., & Delaney, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Egan, Mark
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
124
Pages
11-17
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007077971
Cited by
76
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (303833)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Keywords
youth unemployment, child mental health, economic recession, mental health services, Longitudinal Study of Young People in England, National Child Development Study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Unemployment, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Economic Recession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review