Exploring the views of people with mental health problems’ on the concept of coercion: Towards a broader socio-ethical perspective
Abstract
In mental health care, coercion is a controversial issue that has led to much debate and research on its nature and use. Yet, few previous studies have explicitly explored the views on the concept of coercion among people with first-hand experiences of being coerced. This study includes semi-structured focus-groups and individual interviews with 24 participants who had various mental health problems and experiences with coercion. Data were collected in 2012-2013 in three regions of Norway and analysed by a thematic content analysis. Findings show that participants had wide-ranging accounts of coercion, including formal and informal coercion across health- and welfare services. They emphasised that using coercion reflects the mental health system's tendency to rely on coercion and the lack of voluntary services and treatment methods that are more helpful. Other core characteristics of coercion were deprivation of freedom, power relations, in terms of powerlessness and 'counter-power,' and coercion as existential and social life events. Participants' views are consistent with prevailing theories of coercion and research on perceived coercion. However, this study demonstrates a need for broader existential and socio-ethical perspectives on coercion that are intertwined with treatment and care systems in research and practice. Implications for mental health policy and services are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A qualitative study reported that feeling ill contributed to patients' coercive experiences by reinforcing feelings of powerlessness and making it difficult to resist unwanted treatment.
“Similarly, a qualitative study reported that feeling ill contributed to patients’ coercive experiences by reinforcing feelings of powerlessness and making it difficult to resist unwanted treatment [110].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [110]
Reported threats included the possibility of outpatient commitment, changes in legal status, discharge, changes in medication, unit transfers, negative consequences, and loss of privileges.
“Reported threats included the possibility of outpatient commitment [65], changes in legal status [130], discharge [110], changes in medication [141], unit transfers [130], negative consequences [47], and loss of privileges [68,110,130,141].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [110]
One study reported that patients felt pressured to sign a contract upon arrival at the hospital, which led to the imposition of multiple restrictive practices and pressure to take unwanted medication.
“Additionally, one study reported that patients felt pressured to sign a contract upon arrival at the hospital, which led to the imposition of multiple restrictive practices and pressure to take unwanted medication [110].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [110]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Norvoll, R., & Pedersen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Norvoll, Reidun
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 204-211
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2330162364
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- coercion in mental health care, people with mental health problems, perceived coercion, power relations, powerlessness, counter-power, voluntary care, mental health policy, existential perspective
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Norway, Power, Psychological, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Social Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review