Cited by 45Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomic and Fiscal Studies

The health, financial and distributional consequences of increases in the tobacco excise tax among smokers in Lebanon

Open access
Salti, Nisreen, Brouwer, Elizabeth, Verguet, Stéphane·2016·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Tobacco use is a significant risk factor for the leading causes of death worldwide, including cancer, heart disease and stroke. Most of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where tobacco-related deaths are also rising rapidly. Taxation is one of the most effective tobacco control measures, yet evidence on the distributional impact of tobacco taxation in low- and middle-income countries remains scant. This paper considers the financial and health effects, by socio-economic class, of increasing tobacco taxes in Lebanon, a middle-income country. An Almost Ideal Demand System is used to estimate price elasticities of demand for tobacco products. Extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) methods are applied to quantify, across quintiles of socio-economic status, the health benefits gained, the additional tax revenues raised, and the net financial consequences for households from a 50% increase in the price of tobacco through excise taxes. We find that demand for tobacco is price inelastic with elasticities ranging from -0.32 for the poorest quintile to -0.22 for the richest quintile. The increase in tobacco tax is estimated to result in 65,000 (95% CI: 37,000-93,000) premature deaths averted, 25% of them in the poorest quintile, $300M ($256-340M) of additional tax revenues, 12% borne by the poorest quintile, $23M ($13-33M) of out-of-pocket spending on healthcare averted, 36% of which accrue to the poorest quintile, 9% to the richest. These savings would be associated with 23,000 (13,000-33,000) poverty cases averted (63% in the poorest quintile). Increasing tobacco taxes would lead to large financial and health benefits, and would be pro-poor in health gains, savings on healthcare, and poverty reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established that the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.

    “Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established this: the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.223–229”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 45

Authors
Salti, N., Brouwer, E., & Verguet, S.
Affiliations
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Salti, Nisreen
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
170
Pages
161-169
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2533253483
Cited by
45
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP51229)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tobacco excise tax, tobacco taxation, tobacco control, premature mortality, tax revenue, out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure, poverty reduction, smoking-related diseases, Lebanon
MeSH terms
Smokers, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Consumer Product Safety, Health Expenditures, Female, Humans, Lebanon, Male, Middle Aged, Public Health, Risk Factors, Taxes, Tobacco Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review