Cited by 88Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

“We were on our own”: Mothers' experiences navigating the fragmented system of professional care for autism

Brewer, Alexandra·2018·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Autism is a developmental disorder that emerges in early childhood. Treatments for autism span a wide variety of professionals and paraprofessionals in the medical and educational realms. This article draws on data from a survey of 620 parents of autistic children, including 385 written narratives, to examine the experiences of mothers as they engage with this fragmented system of professional care for children with autism. Findings suggest that engagement with treatments sent families into a complex and confusing universe of diagnosis and treatment. The fragmentation of autism's professional jurisdiction between the medical and educational systems meant that mothers struggled to find comprehensive professional care that met the standards recommended by leading medical research organizations. Many mothers found it necessary to reduce their workforce participation in order to obtain and maintain their children's treatment regimes, a phenomenon that transcended social class. However, the consequences of reducing work had differential impacts on families. While married and high socioeconomic status mothers were more insulated from the potential negative effects of losing one partner's income, single and low SES mothers experienced greater precarity. These findings connect the structure and arrangement of professional jurisdictions to the experiences of parents, suggesting ways that the fragmentation of professional care for autism can have negative impacts for women, single mothers, and low SES families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, A.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Alexandra
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
215
Pages
61-68
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889113001
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, mothers, professional care, parental experiences, labor force participation, single mothers, low socioeconomic status, precarity, gender, diagnosis and treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Middle Aged, Mothers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parenting, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review