Cited by 21LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender, Health, and Social InequalityPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Syndemic statuses: Intersectionality and mobilizing for LGBTQ+ Latinx health equity after the Pulse shooting

Kline, Nolan·2022·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

As a theoretical framework, syndemics offers a way to examine interactions between two or more pathogens or social phenomena that interact synergistically to exacerbate poor health. The concept allows for interrogating the social, political, and economic circumstances responsible for disease clusters, but it insufficiently considers how social factors themselves interrelate to create complex forms of social subjugation. Failing to examine intersecting inequalities that produce the social contexts in which syndemic interactions occur will inhibit efforts to correct the root causes of poor health. To address this shortcoming, I argue there is a need for research on syndemics to be informed by intersectionality-a framework that considers how multiple interlocking types of oppression create distinct structural inequalities and life experiences. Advancing this argument, I draw from ethnographic fieldwork in Orlando, Florida, following the Pulse nightclub shooting, which disproportionately affected LGBTQ+ Latinx individuals who experience intersecting forms of social marginalization and are part of a population at risk for an HIV and psychopathology syndemic. Key informant interviews (n = 13) revealed how LGBTQ+ Latinx organizations emerged after the shooting to mobilize for greater health equity and health programs that directly respond to populations who experience unique inequalities related to their intersecting LGBTQ+ and Latinx identities. Findings from this article show how…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sangaramoorthy and Benton (2021) critique two papers in the Special Issue that emphasize how crucial understanding intersectional drivers of clustered health conditions is for identifying syndemics and potentially mitigating upstream factors that produce them.

    “Sangaramoorthy and Benton (2021) critique two papers in the Special Issue that emphasize how crucial understanding intersectional drivers of clustered health conditions is for identifying syndemics and potentially mitigating upstream factors that produce them (Kline, 2020; Quinn, 2019).”

    From Syndemic theory, methods, and data (2022) · cites this paper as Kline, 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 21

Authors
Kline, N.
Affiliations
Rollins College (US)
Corresponding author
Kline, Nolan
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
295
Pages
113260
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046120211
Cited by
21
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rollins College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
syndemic, intersectionality, Pulse nightclub shooting, health equity, HIV, psychopathology, social mobilization, structural inequality, social marginalization, health vulnerability, Orlando, Florida
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Syndemic, Intersectional Framework, Humans, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review