Syndemic statuses: Intersectionality and mobilizing for LGBTQ+ Latinx health equity after the Pulse shooting
Abstract
As a theoretical framework, syndemics offers a way to examine interactions between two or more pathogens or social phenomena that interact synergistically to exacerbate poor health. The concept allows for interrogating the social, political, and economic circumstances responsible for disease clusters, but it insufficiently considers how social factors themselves interrelate to create complex forms of social subjugation. Failing to examine intersecting inequalities that produce the social contexts in which syndemic interactions occur will inhibit efforts to correct the root causes of poor health. To address this shortcoming, I argue there is a need for research on syndemics to be informed by intersectionality-a framework that considers how multiple interlocking types of oppression create distinct structural inequalities and life experiences. Advancing this argument, I draw from ethnographic fieldwork in Orlando, Florida, following the Pulse nightclub shooting, which disproportionately affected LGBTQ+ Latinx individuals who experience intersecting forms of social marginalization and are part of a population at risk for an HIV and psychopathology syndemic. Key informant interviews (n = 13) revealed how LGBTQ+ Latinx organizations emerged after the shooting to mobilize for greater health equity and health programs that directly respond to populations who experience unique inequalities related to their intersecting LGBTQ+ and Latinx identities. Findings from this article show how…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sangaramoorthy and Benton (2021) critique two papers in the Special Issue that emphasize how crucial understanding intersectional drivers of clustered health conditions is for identifying syndemics and potentially mitigating upstream factors that produce them.
“Sangaramoorthy and Benton (2021) critique two papers in the Special Issue that emphasize how crucial understanding intersectional drivers of clustered health conditions is for identifying syndemics and potentially mitigating upstream factors that produce them (Kline, 2020; Quinn, 2019).”
From Syndemic theory, methods, and data (2022) · cites this paper as Kline, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Kline, N.
- Affiliations
- Rollins College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kline, Nolan
- ORCID
- Kline, Nolan
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 295
- Pages
- 113260
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3046120211
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Rollins College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Keywords
- syndemic, intersectionality, Pulse nightclub shooting, health equity, HIV, psychopathology, social mobilization, structural inequality, social marginalization, health vulnerability, Orlando, Florida
- MeSH terms
- Health Equity, Sexual and Gender Minorities, Syndemic, Intersectional Framework, Humans, Social Environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review