Cited by 18Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Cervical cancer screening invitations in low and middle income countries: Evidence from Armenia

Open access
Antinyan, Armenak, Bertoni, Marco, Corazzini, Luca·2021·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Roughly 90 percent of cervical cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the lack of adequate infrastructures hampers screening, while informational, cultural, and socio-economic barriers limit participation in the few programs that do exist. We conducted a field experiment with the Armenian cervical cancer screening program to determine whether, despite these barriers, the simple, economical invitation strategies adopted in high-income countries could enhance screening take-up in LMICs. We find that letters of invitation increase screening take-up, especially when there are follow-up reminders. Different ways of framing messages appear to have no impact. Finally, women in rural areas are more likely to respond to invitation by letter, helping to narrow the urban-rural screening gap.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113739

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Armenia, there was no difference found between framing the letter neutrally by giving general information, negatively by highlighting the adverse effects, or other-regarding by stressing the impact on family members.

    “In Armenia, there was no difference found between framing the letter neutrally by giving general information, negatively by highlighting the adverse effects, or other-regarding by stressing the impact on family members [53].”
  • In Armenia, invitation letters have increased CC screening, especially when there are follow-up reminders.

    “In Armenia, invitation letters have increased CC screening, especially when there are follow-up reminders [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antinyan, A., Bertoni, M., & Corazzini, L.
Affiliations
  • Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
Corresponding author
Antinyan, Armenak
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
273
Pages
113739
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128717257
Cited by
18
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Government of the Russian Federation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening invitations, low- and middle-income countries, Armenia, follow-up reminders, message framing, urban-rural differences, health communication, barriers to screening
MeSH terms
Armenia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review