Discuss and remember: clinician strategies for integrating social determinants of health in patient records and care
Open accessAbstract
There is growing interest in standardizing data about social determinants of health (SDOH) in electronic health records (EHRs), yet little is known about how clinicians document SDOH in daily practice. This study investigates clinicians' strategies for working with SDOH data and the challenges confronting SDOH standardization. Drawing on ethnographic observation, interviews with patients and clinicians, and systematic review of patient EHRs-all at an urban teaching hospital in the US Midwest-we analyze three strategies clinicians deploy to integrate SDOH data into patient care. First, clinicians document SDOH using "signal phrases," keywords and short sentences that help them recall patients' social stories. Second, clinicians use other technology or face-to-face conversations to share about patients' SDOH with colleagues. Third, clinicians fold discussion of SDOH with patients into their personal relationships. While these local strategies facilitate personalized care and help clinicians minimize their computer workload, we also consider their limitations for efforts to coordinate care across institutions and attempts to identify SDOH in EHRs. These findings reveal ongoing tensions in projects of standardization in medicine, as well as the specific difficulty of standardizing data about SDOH. They have important clinical implications as they help explain how clinicians may attend to patients' SDOH in ways that are not legible in patient records. This paper is also relevant f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature on social risk factor documentation is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.
“But this literature is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.[6][7][8][9]”
From Structured and unstructured social risk factor documentation in the electronic health record underestimates patients’ self-reported risks (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Social determinants of health and diabetes: A scientific review
Hill-Briggs, F., Adler, N. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Navas-Acien, A., Thornton, P. L., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0053 · Cited by 1,732 · see citing works
Lutfey, K., & Freese, J. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/428914 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Gold, R., Cottrell, E., Bunce, A., Middendorf, M., Hollombe, C., Cowburn, S., Mahr, P., & Melgar, G. (2017) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170046 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iott, B. E., Rivas, S., Gottlieb, L. M., Adler-Milstein, J., & Pantell, M. S. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad261 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vale, M. D., & Perkins, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vale, Mira D.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 315
- Pages
- 115548
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309474336
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 351 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041028, T32HD007339)
- National Science Foundation (DGE 1256260)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- social determinants of health, electronic health records, clinical documentation, interprofessional communication, clinician-patient relationship, care coordination, individualized care
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Documentation, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review