Cited by 20Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Discuss and remember: clinician strategies for integrating social determinants of health in patient records and care

Open access
Vale, Mira D., Perkins, Denise White·2022·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

There is growing interest in standardizing data about social determinants of health (SDOH) in electronic health records (EHRs), yet little is known about how clinicians document SDOH in daily practice. This study investigates clinicians' strategies for working with SDOH data and the challenges confronting SDOH standardization. Drawing on ethnographic observation, interviews with patients and clinicians, and systematic review of patient EHRs-all at an urban teaching hospital in the US Midwest-we analyze three strategies clinicians deploy to integrate SDOH data into patient care. First, clinicians document SDOH using "signal phrases," keywords and short sentences that help them recall patients' social stories. Second, clinicians use other technology or face-to-face conversations to share about patients' SDOH with colleagues. Third, clinicians fold discussion of SDOH with patients into their personal relationships. While these local strategies facilitate personalized care and help clinicians minimize their computer workload, we also consider their limitations for efforts to coordinate care across institutions and attempts to identify SDOH in EHRs. These findings reveal ongoing tensions in projects of standardization in medicine, as well as the specific difficulty of standardizing data about SDOH. They have important clinical implications as they help explain how clinicians may attend to patients' SDOH in ways that are not legible in patient records. This paper is also relevant f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115548

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vale, M. D., & Perkins, D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Vale, Mira D.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
315
Pages
115548
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309474336
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041028, T32HD007339)
  • National Science Foundation (DGE 1256260)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
social determinants of health, electronic health records, clinical documentation, interprofessional communication, clinician-patient relationship, care coordination, individualized care
MeSH terms
Communication, Documentation, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review