Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Décloisonner la sociologie de l’engagement militant. Note critique sur quelques tendances récentes des travaux français

Open access
Sawicki, Frédéric, Siméant, Johanna·2009·Sociologie du Travail

Abstract

Cet article présente un état des lieux critique d’un champ de recherche particulièrement actif depuis 20 ans en France, celui de la sociologie de l’engagement militant. Il revient sur le renouvellement de ce courant sociologique, qui s’est traduit par l’avènement du paradigme interactionniste, attentif à la dimension processuelle de l’engagement et des carrières militantes, et sur la façon dont la notion de rétributions du militantisme a été affinée et revisitée. Après avoir mis en perspective les débats théoriques relatifs à l’apparition, ou non, de « nouvelles formes » de militantisme, voire de « nouveaux militants », l’article souligne deux défis de la recherche aujourd’hui, tous deux relatifs à la question de la division sociale du travail : mieux prendre en compte, d’une part, le lien entre transformations macrosociales et engagement et, d’autre part, le façonnage organisationnel du militantisme. This critique reviews an especially active field of research during the last 20 years in France: the sociology of activism. In this current of sociology, a new interactionist paradigm has emerged that takes into account activists’ careers and the process of becoming an activist. This critique focuses on how the idea of the “rewards” of activism has been reworked. After reviewing theoretical debates about whether or not new forms of activism and new activists are arising, this article points out two issues for current research, both related to the social division of labor, namely: improving our understanding of, on the one hand, the linkage between macrosocial changes and activism and, on the other hand, of the way that organizations shape activism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soctra.2008.12.006

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Metadata

Authors
Sawicki, F., & Siméant, J.
Venue
Sociologie du Travail
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
97-125
ISSN
0038-0296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4256158268
Cited by
386
References
45
FWCI
53.19
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Décloisonner la sociologie de l’engagement militant. Note critique sur quelques tendances récentes des travaux français. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soctra.2008.12.006
The paper
Sawicki, F., & Siméant, J. (2009). Décloisonner la sociologie de l’engagement militant. Note critique sur quelques tendances récentes des travaux français. Sociologie du Travail. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2008.12.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.