Cited by 249Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Identification of groups of metabolically-active rhizosphere microorganisms by stable isotope probing of PLFAs

Treonis, Amy M., Ostle, Nick J., Stott, Andrew W., Primrose, Ruth, Grayston, Sue J., Ineson, Philip·2004·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

We combined microbial community phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analyses with an in situ stable isotope 13CO2 labelling approach to identify microbial groups actively involved in assimilation of root-derived C in limed grassland soils. We hypothesized that the application of lime would stimulate more rapid 13C assimilation and turnover in microbial PLFAs. Four and 8 d after label application, 18:1omega9, 18:2omega6,9 (fungal biomarkers) and 16:1omega7, 18:1omega7, 19:0cy (Gram-negative bacterial biomarkers) showed the most 13C enrichment and rapid turnover rates. This suggests that these microorganisms were assimilating recently-photosynthesized root C inputs to soils. Contrary to our hypothesis, liming did not affect assimilation or turnover rates of 13C-labelled C. 13C stable isotope pulse-labelling technique paired with analyses of PLFA microbial biomarkers shows promise for in situ investigations of microbial function in soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.10.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Particular specific monounsaturated fatty acids such as PLFA 16:1ω5, 16:1ω7, 17:1ω8 and 18:1ω7 are highly enriched by root-derived organic carbon in label experiments.

    “Particular specific monounsaturated fatty acids such as PLFA 16:1 o 5, 16:1 o 7, 17:1 o 8 and 18:1 o 7 were shown to be highly enriched by root-derived organic carbon in label experiments 54,55 .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 249

Authors
Treonis, A. M., Ostle, N. J., Stott, A. W., Primrose, R., Grayston, S. J., & Ineson, P.
Affiliations
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Treonis, Amy M.
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
533-537
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998220314
Cited by
249
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
rhizosphere microorganisms, phospholipid fatty acids, stable isotope probing, 13C pulse labeling, root-derived carbon, carbon assimilation, carbon turnover, liming, grassland soils, fungal biomarkers, Gram-negative bacteria, microbial community function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review