Cited by 28Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsTardigrade Biology and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Recovery of reproduction after drought in the soil living Folsomia candida (Collembola)

Waagner, Dorthe, Bayley, Mark, Holmstrup, Martin·2011·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Soil dwelling (euedaphic) Collembola have evolved to live in soil pores where the atmosphere is saturated with water vapour. Here we show that reproduction in the euedaphic Folsomia candida ceases during drought where soil water potentials are lower than −7 bar (∼99.4% RH). Recovery of the moulting cycle after cessation of drought showed increasing delay with increasing previous drought pressure. However, reproduction was rapidly resumed. Only in F. candida recovering from the most severe drought (−55 bar, 96% RH) was the time lapse between drought and resumed reproduction significantly different from the control (99.4% RH). Furthermore, the final numbers of eggs were unaffected by the degree of drought exposure. Hence, these results suggest that while even very mild drought will stop the reproductive cycle, subsequent recovery is rapid and complete.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 28

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bayley, 1999, Water vapor absorption in arthropods by accumulation of myoinositol and glucose, Science, 285, 1909, 10.1126/science.285.5435.1909 · DOI
  2. Harte, 1996, Effects of manipulated soil microclimate on mesofaunal biomass and diversity, Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28, 313, 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00139-5 · DOI
  3. Holmstrup, 2001, Dehydration tolerance and water vapour absorption in two species of soil-dwelling Collembola by accumulation of sugars and polyols, Functional Ecology, 15, 647, 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00565.x · DOI
  4. Jucevica, 2006, Global warming affect Collembola community: a long-term study, Pedobiologia, 50, 177, 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.10.006 · DOI
  5. Krogh, 1995, Does a heterogeneous distribution of food or pesticide affect the outcome of toxicity tests with Collembola, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 30, 158, 10.1006/eesa.1995.1020 · DOI
  6. Kuperman, 2002, Precipitation and pollution interaction effect on the abundance of Collembola in hardwood forests in the lower Midwestern United States, European Journal of Soil Biology, 38, 277, 10.1016/S1164-5563(02)01159-7 · DOI
  7. Lindberg, 2002, Effects of experimental irrigation and drought on the composition and diversity of soil fauna in a coniferous stand, Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 924, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00769.x · DOI
  8. Maraldo, 2009, Recovery of enchytraeid populations after severe drought events, Applied Soil Ecology, 42, 227, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.04.004 · DOI
  9. Milne, 1960, Studies on life histories of various species of arthropleone collembola, The Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, A, 133, 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1960.tb00662.x · DOI
  10. Pflug, 2001, Influence of drought and litter age on Collembola communities, European Journal of Soil Biology, 37, 305, 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01101-3 · DOI
  11. Snider, 1973, Laboratory observations on the biology of Folsomia candida (Willem) (Collembola: Isotomidae), Revue d Écologie et de Biologie du Sol, 10, 103
  12. Timmermans, 2009, Sugar sweet springtails: on the transcriptional response of Folsomia candida (Collembola) to desiccation stress, Insect Molecular Biology, 18, 737, 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00916.x · DOI
  13. Whitford, 1999, Effects of repeated drought on soil microarthropod communities in the northern Chihuahuan desert, Biology and Fertility of Soils, 28, 117, 10.1007/s003740050471 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Waagner, D., Bayley, M., & Holmstrup, M.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Waagner, Dorthe
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
690-692
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966768273
Cited by
28
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Villum Fonden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
Keywords
Folsomia candida, Collembola, drought, reproduction, soil water potential, humidity, moulting cycle, recovery, soil fauna

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review