The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil – The role of soil aeration
Abstract
Biochar application to soil has significant potential as a climate change mitigation strategy, due to its recalcitrant C content and observed effect to suppress soil greenhouse gas emissions such as nitrous oxide (N₂O). Increased soil aeration following biochar amendment may contribute to this suppression. Soil cores from a Miscanthus X. giganteus plantation were amended with hardwood biochar at a rate of 2% dry soil weight (22 t ha⁻¹). The cores were incubated at three different temperatures (4, 10 and 16 °C) for 126 days, maintained field moist and half subjected to periodic wetting events. Cumulative N₂O production was consistently suppressed by at least 49% with biochar amendment within 48 h of wetting at 10 and 16 °C. We concluded that hardwood biochar suppressed soil N₂O emissions following wetting at a range of field-relevant temperatures over four months. We hypothesised that this was due to biochar increasing soil aeration at relatively high moisture contents by increasing the water holding capacity (WHC) of the soil; however, this hypothesis was rejected. We found that 5% and 10% biochar amendment increased soil WHC. Also, 10% biochar amendment decreased bulk density of the soil. Sealed incubations were performed with biochar added at 0–10 % of dry soil weight and wetted to a uniform 87% WHC (78% WFPS). Cumulative N₂O production within 60 h of wetting was 19, 19, 73 and 98% lower than the biochar-free control in the 1, 2, 5 and 10% biochar treatments respectively. We conclude that high levels of biochar amendment may change soil physical properties, but that the enhancement of soil aeration by biochar incorporation makes only a minimal contribution to the suppression of N₂O emissions from a sandy loam soil. We suggest that microbial or physical immobilisation of NO₃ ⁻ in soil following biochar addition may significantly contribute to the suppression of soil N₂O emissions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physical immobilization of NO3- is an important mechanism of biochar's N2O mitigation.
“Physical immobilization of NO 3 -is another important mechanism (Case et al. 2012).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Case et al. 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 61 · Cited by 452
- Authors
- Case, S. D. C., McNamara, N. P., Reay, D. S., & Whitaker, J.
- Affiliations
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Case, Sean D.C.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042148555
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 43.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Keywords
- biochar amendment, nitrous oxide emissions, soil aeration, soil CO2 efflux, sandy loam soil, Miscanthus × giganteus, water holding capacity, soil bulk density, soil temperature, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, hardwood biochar
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review