Cited by 108Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Pyrogenic carbon additions to soil counteract positive priming of soil carbon mineralization by plants

Whitman, Thea, Enders, Akio, Lehmann, Johannes·2014·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Important due to both its role in fire-affected ecosystems, and also its proposed intentional production and application for carbon (C) management, pyrogenic organic matter (PyOM) is thought to contain very stable forms of C. However, the mechanisms behind its interactions with non-PyOM soil organic C (SOC) remain speculative, with studies often showing short-term positive and then long-term negative “priming effects” on SOC decomposition after PyOM applications. Furthermore, studies of these interactions to date have been limited to systems that do not include plants. This study describes results from a 12-week greenhouse experiment where PyOM-SOC priming effects with and without plants were investigated using stable isotope partitioning. In addition, we investigated the optimal δ13C proxies for sources of SOC, PyOM, and plant-derived CO2 emissions. The two-factorial experiment included the presence or absence of corn plants and of 13C-labelled PyOM. In order to control for pH and nutrient addition effects from PyOM, its pH was adjusted to that of the soil and optimal nutrient and water conditions were provided to the plants. The δ13C of PyOM sub-components were significantly different. Significant losses of 0.4% of the applied PyOM-C occurred in the first week. We find evidence for a “negative priming” effect of PyOM on SOC in the system (SOC losses are 48% lower with PyOM present), which occurred primarily during the first week, indicating it may be due to transient effect…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 108

Authors
Whitman, T., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Lehmann, Johannes
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
73
Pages
33-41
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007673953
Cited by
108
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University
  • Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
pyrogenic organic matter, soil carbon priming, soil carbon mineralization, soil organic carbon, corn plants, plant carbon input, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review