Soil aggregation: influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes
Abstract
Our 1988 paper, describing the effects of cultivation on microbial biomass and activity in different aggregate size classes, brought together the ‘aggregate hierarchy theory’ and the ‘microbial biomass concept’. This enabled us to identify the relationships between microbial and microhabitat (aggregate) properties and organic matter distribution and explain some of their responses to disturbance. By combining biochemical and direct microscopy based quantification of microbial abundance with enzyme activities and process measurements, this study provided evidence for the role of microbial biomass (especially fungi) in macroaggregate dynamics and carbon and nutrient flush following cultivation. In the last ten years environmental genomic techniques have provided much new knowledge on bacterial composition in aggregate size fractions yet detailed information about other microbial groups (e.g. fungi, archaea and protozoa) is lacking.We now know that soil aggregates are dynamic entities – constantly changing with regard to their biological, chemical and physical properties and, in particular, their influences on plant nutrition and health. As a consequence, elucidation of the many mechanisms regulating soil C and nutrient dynamics demands a better understanding of the role of specific members of microbial communities and their metabolic capabilities as well as their location within the soil matrix (e.g. aggregates, pore spaces) and their reciprocal relationship with plant roots. I…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observed increases in SOM were likely mediated by greater aggregation, as aggregation is one of the primary mechanisms of SOM stabilization via physical protection and microbial habitat, and we observed a 5-fold increase in both SOM and wet aggregate stability over the chronosequence.
“Observed increases in SOM were likely mediated by greater aggregation, as aggregation is one of the primary mechanisms of SOM stabilization via physical protection and microbial habitat (Tisdall and Oades, 1982;Gupta and Germida, 2015), and we observed a 5-fold increase in both SOM and wet aggregate stability over the chronosequence.”
From Ecosystem Impacts and Productive Capacity of a Multi-Species Pastured Livestock System (2020) · cites this paper as Gupta and Germida, 2015
Cites
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage
Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Beiyuan, J., Gupta, S., Hou, D., Karakoti, A., Joseph, S., Jung, S., Kim, K.-H., Kirkham, M. B., et al. (2022) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Zheng, H., Wang, X., Luo, X., Wang, Z., & Xing, B. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.166 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Ecosystem Impacts and Productive Capacity of a Multi-Species Pastured Livestock System
Rowntree, J. E., Stanley, P. L., Maciel, I. C. F., Thorbecke, M., Rosenzweig, S. T., Hancock, D. W., Guzman, A., & Raven, M. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.544984 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“This is considerably less than a recent study by Heflin et al. (2019), who modeled a grass finishing system in the lower Southern Plains and indicated a time to slaughter of 30 months with an average CW 40 kg greater than our MSPR system.”
BackgroundRevegetation and ecosystem reclamation of post-mined land: toward sustainable mining
Zine, H., Hakkou, R., Papazoglou, E. G., Elmansour, A., Abrar, F., & Benzaazoua, M. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-024-05697-3 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gupta, V. V. S. R., & Germida, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, Vadakattu V.S.R.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- A3-A9
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985151603
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- soil aggregation, aggregate size classes, microbial biomass, soil microhabitats, soil organic matter distribution, soil fungi, soil enzyme activity, soil microbial diversity, plant nutrition, soil microbial communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review