Priming of pyrogenic C (biochar) mineralization by dissolved organic matter and vice versa
Abstract
Due to expected changes in fire frequency and the potential of using pyrolyzed biomass (biochar) amendments to increase soil C storage, there is a need for better ability to predict pyrogenic C (pyC) longevity in soil and its effects on native soil C stability. However, C mineralization from biochar/soil mixtures has been shown to vary greatly and both ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ priming (increased and decreased mineralization of native C, respectively) following biochar amendments have been observed. To better understand the interactions that influence mineralization of pyC and native soil C, bagasse (sugar cane residues) and bagasse biochar pyrolyzed at 300 and 650 °C were incubated in sand over 144 d with soil microbes and dissolved organic matter (DOM) substrates of high and low reactivity (sucrose and humic acid: HA, respectively). Mineralization of particulate and dissolved C was quantified based upon the distinct C isotopic signature of CO2 evolved from each source. Negative priming of bagasse-C mineralization by sucrose (−9.3% cumulative C mineralized) and pyC mineralization by HA (−29 and −68% for low and high temperature biochar, respectively) pointed to the mechanism of ‘substrate switching’, i.e. cases in which added DOM was of greater or similar lability to the particulate OM present. In contrast, positive priming of bagasse mineralization by HA (+77%) and pyC mineralization by sucrose (+271 and 614% for low and high temperature biochar, respectively), was attributed to the mechanisms of soil conditioning (creation of an environment more favourable to microbial growth) and co-metabolism, respectively. Inversely, presence of all the particulates enhanced the mineralization of sucrose (by 8, 58 and 91% for bagasse and low and high temperature biochar, respectively), suggesting a soil conditioning mechanism. In contrast, the biochars had little effect on HA mineralization, likely because of their similar inherent stability and chemistry. These results show that DOM and pyC mineralization in soil is interactive and varies with OM type. Furthermore, the priming observed could be attributed to different mechanisms in different cases, the long term effect of which would likely be greater soil C sequestration than predicted by simple degradation models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive priming is induced via the addition of fresh labile carbon which can stimulate the activities of soil microorganisms, thus accelerating the carbon mineralization process.
“Positive priming is induced via the addition of fresh labile carbon which can stimulate the activities of soil microorganisms, thus accelerating the carbon mineralization process (Fang et al. 2019; Keith et al. 2011; Zimmerman and Ouyang 2019).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Zimmerman and Ouyang 2019
Cites
Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils
Zimmerman, A. R., Gao, B., & Ahn, M.-Y. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.005 · Cited by 1,438 · see citing works
Self-citationBiochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects
Wang, J., Xiong, Z., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12266 · Cited by 1,316 · see citing works
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R., & Lehmann, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902266r · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
A meta‐analysis on pyrogenic organic matter induced priming effect
Maestrini, B., Nannipieri, P., & Abiven, S. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12194 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zimmerman, A. R., & Ouyang, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmerman, Andrew R.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 105-112
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903625473
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- pyrogenic carbon, biochar, dissolved organic matter, carbon mineralization, priming, substrate switching, soil conditioning, cometabolism, humic acid, sucrose, soil carbon sequestration, fire frequency, pyrolysis temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review