The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures
Open accessAbstract
Many studies have been performed to put quantifying uncertainties into the seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. This paper provides a risk-assessment support tool for purpose of retrofitting and potential design strategies of RC buildings. Machine Learning (ML) algorithms were developed in Python software by innovative methods of hyperparameter optimization, such as halving search, grid search, random search, fine-tuning method, and the k -fold cross-validation, to derive the seismic fragility curve for accelerating seismic risk assessment. Proposed ML methods significantly reduced the computational efforts compared to conventional procedure of seismic fragility assessment. The prediction results can be combined with considered hazard curves for the purpose of seismic risk assessment of RC buildings. To prepare the training dataset, Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDAs) were performed on 165 RC frames to achieve 1121184 data points. Performance indicators showed that the algorithms of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Extra-Trees Regressor (ETR), Extremely Randomized Tree Regressor (ERTR), Bagging Regressor (BR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting Regression (HGBR) had higher performance, which achieved acceptable accuracy and fitted to actual curves. In addition, Graphical User Interface (GUI) was introduced as a practical tool yet reliable for seismic risk assessment of RC buildings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Geurts, P., Ernst, D., & Wehenkel, L. (2006) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 · Cited by 9,300
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Support Vector Regression Machines
Drucker, H., Burges, C. J. C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A. J., & Vapnik, V. N. (1996) · Cited by 4,658
Höskuldsson, A. (1988) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.1180020306 · Cited by 1,881
Machine learning-based compressive strength prediction for concrete: An adaptive boosting approach
Feng, D.-C., Liu, Z.-T., Wang, X.-D., Chen, Y., Chang, J.-Q., Wei, D.-F., & Jiang, Z.-M. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117000 · Cited by 856
Mangalathu, S., & Jeon, J.-S. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.008 · Cited by 363
Mangalathu, S., Jang, H., Hwang, S.-H., & Jeon, J.-S. (2020) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110331 · Cited by 327
Integrating metaheuristics and Artificial Neural Networks for improved stock price prediction
Göçken, M., Özçalıcı, M., Boru, A., & Dosdoğru, A. T. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.09.029 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Kazemi, F., Asgarkhani, N., & Jankowski, R.
- Venue
- Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 166
- Pages
- 107761
- ISSN
- 0267-7261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313706061
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 33.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761
- The paper
- Kazemi, F., Asgarkhani, N., & Jankowski, R. (2023). Machine learning-based seismic fragility and seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.