Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Seismic performance of a precast bridge pier with a novel externally assembled 3U energy dissipator (EA3UED): Experimental and analytical study

Al-Shaebi, Rashad, Li, Ning, Al-Haaj, Mohammed, Al-Shami, Qahtan, Amer, Mohammed, Al-Olofi, Ahmed·2026·Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109726
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109726

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Billington, 1999, A precast segmental substructure system for standard bridges, PCI J, 44, 56, 10.15554/pcij.07011999.56.73 · doi:10.15554/pcij.07011999.56.73
  2. Ou, 2007, Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns, J Struct Eng, 133, 1636, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636
  3. Liu, 2022, Precast segmental piers: testing, modeling and seismic assessment of an emulative connection based on a grounded central tendon, Bull Earthq Eng, 20, 2529, 10.1007/s10518-022-01335-w · doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01335-w
  4. Qu, 2018, Investigation and verification on seismic behavior of precast concrete frame piers used in real bridge structures: experimental and numerical study, Eng Struct, 154, 1, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.069 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.069
  5. Tazarv, 2016, Low-damage precast columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones, J Bridg Eng, 21, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000806 · doi:10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000806
  6. Li, 2018, Seismic performance of precast concrete bridge columns with quasi-static cyclic shear test for high seismic zones, Eng Struct, 166, 441, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.086 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.086
  7. Wang, 2018, Seismic behavior of precast segmental uhpc bridge columns with replaceable external cover plates and internal dissipaters, Eng Struct, 177, 540, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.012 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.012
  8. Zhang, 2020, Seismic performance of bridge with unbonded posttensioned self-centering segmented concrete-filled steel-tube columns: An underwater shaking table test, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 138, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106350 · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106350
  9. Wang, 2025, Seismic performance of precast segmental square hollow columns with different design details: Experimental and numerical study, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 191, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109245 · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109245
  10. Al-Shaebi, 2024, Cyclic performance of precast segmented bridge pier with inner column socket connection: A parametric study, Structures, 62, 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106233 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106233
  11. Bu, 2015, Cyclic loading test of unbonded and bonded posttensioned precast segmental bridge columns with circular section, J Bridg Eng, 21
  12. Al-Haaj, 2025, Seismic performance of unbonded posttensioned precast hollow segmental bridge piers under biaxial lateral loading, Structures, 76, 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108985 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108985
  13. Chou, 2008, Hysteretic model development and seismic response of unbonded post-tensioned precast cft segmental bridge columns, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 37, 919, 10.1002/eqe.796 · doi:10.1002/eqe.796
  14. Gao, 2025, Sensitivity analysis of design parameters on the seismic performance of self-centering precast segmental bridge columns, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 190, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109124 · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109124
  15. Motaref, 2014, Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns, J Bridg Eng, 19, 186, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518 · doi:10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000518
  16. Nguyen, 2017, Seismic response of a rocking bridge column using a precast hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HyFRC) tube, Compos Struct, 174, 252, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.058 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.04.058
  17. Ou, 2013, An emulative precast segmental concrete bridge column for seismic regions, Earthq Spectra, 29, 1441, 10.1193/082511EQS205M · doi:10.1193/082511eqs205m
  18. Zhang, 2020, Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge columns repaired with CFRP wraps, Compos Struct, 243, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112218 · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112218
  19. Li, 2019, Seismic performances of precast segmental column under bidirectional earthquake motions: Shake table test and numerical evaluation, Eng Struct, 187, 314, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.001 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.001
  20. Wang, 2018, Quasi-static cyclic tests of precast bridge columns with different connection details for high seismic zones, Eng Struct, 158, 13, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.035 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.035
  21. Hung, 2017, Experimental study and numerical simulation of precast segmental bridge columns with unbonded post-tensioning under cyclic loading, J Struct Eng, 143
  22. Jia, 2020, Seismic evaluation of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomeric pads, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 128, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105868 · doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105868
  23. Ou, 2010, Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 39, 1181, 10.1002/eqe.986 · doi:10.1002/eqe.986
  24. Al-Shaebi, 2025, Experimental and analytical investigations of novel external replaceable ring energy dissipator subjected to cyclic loading, Eng Struct, 336, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120380 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120380
  25. Chou, 2006, Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast cft segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 35, 159, 10.1002/eqe.512 · doi:10.1002/eqe.512
  26. Marriott, 2009, Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 38, 331, 10.1002/eqe.857 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Zhang, 2021, Experimental study on seismic performance of precast steel fiber high-strength concrete columns with high-strength steel bars, Adv Struct Eng, 24, 10.1177/13694332211011551 · doi:10.1177/13694332211011551
  28. Al-Shaebi, 2024, Seismic performance of novel high-strength steel external assembled 3U energy dissipator, Constr Build Mater, 456, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139268 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2022, Precast concrete column base with replaceable energy dissipation connectors: quasi-static tests and numerical research, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 51, 1038, 10.1002/eqe.3603 · doi:10.1002/eqe.3603
  30. Andishen, 2018, Cyclic behavior of corded fuse-type dissipaters for posttensioned rocking bridges, J Bridg Eng, 23
  31. Jia, 2022, Seismic performance of precast segmental bridge columns reinforced with both stainless-steel bars and GFRP bars, J Bridg Eng, 27, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001810 · doi:10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001810
  32. Ou, 2010, Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions, J Struct Eng, 136, 255, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000110 · doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000110
  33. White, 2016, Quasi-static testing of posttensioned nonemulative column-footing connections for bridge piers, J Bridg Eng, 21, 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000872 · doi:10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000872
  34. Palermo, 2005, Concept and development of hybrid solutions for seismic resistant bridge systems, J Earthq Eng, 9, 899, 10.1080/13632460509350571 · doi:10.1080/13632460509350571
  35. Park, 1989, Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing, Bull N. Z Soc Earthq Eng, 22, 155
  36. Zheng, 2013, Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete bridge piers, China Civ Eng J, 46, 44
  37. Wang, 2018, An explicit analytical model for seismic performance of an unbonded post-tensioned precast segmental rocking hollow pier, Eng Struct, 161, 176, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.025 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.025
  38. Wang, 2017, Axial compression ratio limit for self-centering precast segmental hollow piers, Struct Concr, 18, 668, 10.1002/suco.201600152 · doi:10.1002/suco.201600152
  39. Mander, 1988, Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete, J Struct Eng, 114, 1804, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804 · Paper page
  40. Kawashima, 1998, Residual displacement response spectrum, J Struct Eng, 124, 523, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523
  41. Wang, 2018, Cyclic loading test of self-centering precast segmental unbonded posttensioned uhpfrc bridge columns, Bull Earthq Eng, 16, 5227, 10.1007/s10518-018-0331-y · doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0331-y
  42. Seo, 2005, Ductility demands on self-centering systems under earthquake loading, ACI Struct J, 102, 275
  43. Blandon, 2005, Equivalent viscous damping equations for direct displacement based design, J Earthq Eng, 9, 257, 10.1142/S1363246905002390 · doi:10.1142/s1363246905002390

Metadata

Authors
Al-Shaebi, R., Li, N., Al-Haaj, M., Al-Shami, Q., Amer, M., & Al-Olofi, A.
Venue
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-01
Volume
200
Pages
109726
ISSN
0267-7261
DOI
10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109726
Cited by
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • International Science and Technology Cooperation Programme (2024YFE0198400)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178496, 52478544)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seismic performance of a precast bridge pier with a novel externally assembled 3U energy dissipator (EA3UED): Experimental and analytical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109726
The paper
Al-Shaebi, R., Li, N., Al-Haaj, M., Al-Shami, Q., Amer, M., & Al-Olofi, A. (2026). Seismic performance of a precast bridge pier with a novel externally assembled 3U energy dissipator (EA3UED): Experimental and analytical study. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.