Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 146Solar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solcast: Validation of a satellite-derived solar irradiance dataset

Bright, Jamie M.·2019·Solar Energy

Abstract

Abstract Solcast ( https://solcast.com/ ) is a global solar forecasting and historical solar irradiance data company. Their datasets are important to the scientific community as substantial amounts of historical data is made freely available to researchers. Solcast’s hourly averages and sub-hourly instantaneous (10/15-min) global horizontal irradiance (GHI) estimates are validated at 48 BSRN ground stations that contain 1,014,792 valid hourly average measurements and 2,932,976 valid instantaneous measurements. The data are validated globally and across four climates under clear-sky, clouded-sky and all-sky periods, repeated for ‘all zenith angles’ ( θ _ z 85 ° ) and high-sun zenith angles ( θ _ z 50 ° ). A site-by-site validation is also performed for both hourly and instantaneous datasets. All validations and recommendations are impartial and unbiased. The hourly dataset validated similarly for both zenith angle scenarios, which is remarkable due to the added complexities at low-sun angles. In terms of rRMSE, the global performances of hourly GHI under clear-sky, clouded-sky and all-sky were 3.4%, 25.6% and 16.9%, respectively. With each ground station equally weighted, the overall bias was 0.33%, and standard deviation of biases at 1.7%. Solcast’s instantaneous GHI product validations were at times similar to the hourly validations though is naturally harder with increasing temporal resolution. The historical datasets from Solcast are found to be of good quality, thus, they are recommended for use by researchers. Identified areas for improvement herein will guide future developments of Solcast’s methodology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.086

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 146

Metadata

Authors
Bright, J. M.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bright, Jamie M.
Venue
Solar Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
189
Pages
435-449
ISSN
0038-092X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964466523
Cited by
146
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Solar Energy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Renewable Energy Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Keywords
satellite-derived solar irradiance, global radiation, data validation, photovoltaic power forecasting, clear-sky conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solcast: Validation of a satellite-derived solar irradiance dataset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.086
The paper
Bright, J. M. (2019). Solcast: Validation of a satellite-derived solar irradiance dataset. Solar Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.086

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.