The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels
Open accessAbstract
Lifecycle impacts of photovoltaic (PV) plants have been largely explored in several studies. However, the end-of-life phase has been generally excluded or neglected from these analyses, mainly because of the low amount of panels that reached the disposal yet and the lack of data about their end of life. It is expected that the disposal of PV panels will become a relevant environmental issue in the next decades. This article illustrates and analyses an innovative process for the recycling of silicon PV panel. The process is based on a sequence of physical (mechanical and thermal) treatments followed by acid leaching and electrolysis. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology has been applied to account for the environmental impacts of the process. Environmental benefits (i.e. credits) due to the potential productions of secondary raw materials have been intentionally excluded, as the focus is on the recycling process. The article provides transparent and disaggregated information on the end-of-life stage of silicon PV panel, which could be useful for other LCA practitioners for future assessment of PV technologies. The study highlights that the impacts are concentrated on the incineration of the panel׳s encapsulation layers, followed by the treatments to recover silicon metal, silver, copper, aluminium. For example around 20% of the global warming potential impact is due to the incineration of the sandwich layer and 30% to the post-incineration treatments. Transport is also relevant for several impact categories, ranging from a minimum of about 10% (for the freshwater eutrophication) up to 80% (for the Abiotic Depletion Potential – minerals).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling
Chowdhury, M. S., Rahman, K. S., Chowdhury, T., Nuthammachot, N., Techato, K., Akhtaruzzaman, M., Tiong, S. K., Sopian, K., & Amin, N. (2020) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100431 · Cited by 785
Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic Panels
Muteri, V., Cellura, M., Curto, D., Franzitta, V., Longo, S., Mistretta, M., & Parisi, M. L. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13010252 · Cited by 389
Farrell, C. C., Osman, A. I., Doherty, R., Saad, M., Zhang, X., Murphy, A., Harrison, J., Vennard, A. S. M., Kumaravel, V., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., et al. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109911 · Cited by 326
Management of end-of-life photovoltaic panels as a step towards a circular economy
Sica, D., Malandrino, O., Supino, S., Testa, M., & Lucchetti, M. C. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.039 · Cited by 258
End-of-life photovoltaic modules: a systematic quantitative literature review
Mahmoudi, S., Huda, N., Alavi, Z., Islam, M. T., & Behnia, M. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.018 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Latunussa, C. E. L., Ardente, F., Blengini, G. A., & Mancini, L.
- Venue
- Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0927-0248 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2324749873
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.020
- The paper
- Latunussa, C. E. L., Ardente, F., Blengini, G. A., & Mancini, L. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.