Cited by 277Municipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and RecyclingRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Increasing textile circulation – consequences and requirements

Dahlbo, Helena, Aalto, Kristiina, Eskelinen, Hanna, Salmenperä, Hanna·2017·Sustainable Production and Consumption

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spc.2016.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential avoidance of the production of virgin conventional cotton has been shown to be an important environmental gain of textile reuse and recycling.

    “as the potential avoidance of the production of virgin conventional cotton has been shown to be an important environmental gain of textile reuse (Dahlbo et al., 2017;Roos et al., 2017;Sahni et al., 2010;Woolridge et al., 2006) and recycling (Esteve-Turrillas and de la Guardia, 2017;Yasin et al., 2016;€ Ostlund et al., 2015;Muthu et al., 2012a;Allwood et al., 2006)”

    From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al., 2017

  • When reuse and recycling are both considered, reuse is found to be more beneficial than recycling, except under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances.

    “When reuse and recycling are both considered, the former is found to be more beneficial than the latter (Dahlbo et al., 2017;Schmidt et al., 2016;Zamani et al., 2015;Beton et al., 2014;Corsten et al., 2013;Palm et al., 2013;Farrant et al., 2010;McGill, 2009;Bartl, 2009), except for under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances (Fortuna and Diyamandoglu, 2017).”

    From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al., 2017

  • Data from Zamani et al. (2015) has subsequently been used as input to Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.

    “Data from the latter has subsequently been used as input to the studies of Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.”

    From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al. (2017)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahlbo, H., Aalto, K., Eskelinen, H., & Salmenperä, H.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Dahlbo, Helena
Venue
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
9
Pages
44-57
ISSN
2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2486128620
Cited by
277
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sustainable Production and Consumption (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Environment (YM192/481/2012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
textile recycling, textile reuse, textile waste, municipal solid waste, life cycle assessment, chemical recycling, environmental policy instruments, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review