Increasing textile circulation – consequences and requirements
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The potential avoidance of the production of virgin conventional cotton has been shown to be an important environmental gain of textile reuse and recycling.
“as the potential avoidance of the production of virgin conventional cotton has been shown to be an important environmental gain of textile reuse (Dahlbo et al., 2017;Roos et al., 2017;Sahni et al., 2010;Woolridge et al., 2006) and recycling (Esteve-Turrillas and de la Guardia, 2017;Yasin et al., 2016;€ Ostlund et al., 2015;Muthu et al., 2012a;Allwood et al., 2006)”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al., 2017
When reuse and recycling are both considered, reuse is found to be more beneficial than recycling, except under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances.
“When reuse and recycling are both considered, the former is found to be more beneficial than the latter (Dahlbo et al., 2017;Schmidt et al., 2016;Zamani et al., 2015;Beton et al., 2014;Corsten et al., 2013;Palm et al., 2013;Farrant et al., 2010;McGill, 2009;Bartl, 2009), except for under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances (Fortuna and Diyamandoglu, 2017).”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al., 2017
Data from Zamani et al. (2015) has subsequently been used as input to Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.
“Data from the latter has subsequently been used as input to the studies of Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Dahlbo et al. (2017)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
Towards Circular Economy in Fashion: Review of Strategies, Barriers and Enablers
Dissanayake, D. G. K., & Weerasinghe, D. (2022) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00090-5 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Lin, P.-H., & Chen, W.-H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148950 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dahlbo, H., Aalto, K., Eskelinen, H., & Salmenperä, H.
- Affiliations
- Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Dahlbo, Helena
- Venue
- Sustainable Production and Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 44-57
- ISSN
- 2352-5509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2486128620
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sustainable Production and Consumption (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Environment (YM192/481/2012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Keywords
- textile recycling, textile reuse, textile waste, municipal solid waste, life cycle assessment, chemical recycling, environmental policy instruments, Finland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review